The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
No Shortcuts to Safer Opioid Prescribing
Open accessAbstract
No Shortcuts to Safer Opioid Prescribing The CDC’s 2016 Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain has largely been embraced by the medical and health policy communities. Unfortunately, some policies and practices purportedly derived from the guideline have been inconsistent with its recommendations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Clinicians should also be aware of unintended conse quences of tapering opioids - including acute opioid withdrawal, uncontrolled pain, and even suicide - and balance the risks and benefits of continued opioid use 303 .”
From Substance use disorders: a comprehensive update of classification, epidemiology, neurobiology, clinical aspects, treatment and prevention (2023) · cites this paper as [303]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In order for the process to be successful, patients require a clear commitment to stop opioids and need considerable support; 5 incautious tapering can do harm, shaking patient confidence and reducing the chance of successful deprescribing and should not be imposed.12,13”
From Tapering and withdrawing opioids: guidance informed by fundamental principles to minimise withdrawal symptoms (2025) · cites this paper as [13]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“There is also consensus on the observation that the time taken for patients to taper off opioids is highly variable, with some patients requiring months or years to successfully stop opioids, especially when use has been prolonged.5,13”
From Tapering and withdrawing opioids: guidance informed by fundamental principles to minimise withdrawal symptoms (2025) · cites this paper as [13]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“There is also consensus on the observation that the time taken for patients to taper off opioids is highly variable, with some patients requiring months or years to successfully stop opioids, especially when use has been prolonged.5,13”
From Tapering and withdrawing opioids: guidance informed by fundamental principles to minimise withdrawal symptoms (2025) · cites this paper as [13]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In 2019, Dowel et al published a commentary that re-emphasized that the CDC guideline calls for maximizing use of physical, psychological, and multimodal pain treatments, which have not been available, used, or reimbursed sufficiently. 7”
From Overview and Feasibility of a Novel Transdisciplinary Integrative Approach to High Impact Chronic Pain in Vermont (2024) · cites this paper as [7]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The PATH program maximizes the use of physical, psychological, and integrative pain treatments within a transdisciplinary model accessible to patients and is consistent with the CDC 2019 statement and call to action. 7”
From Overview and Feasibility of a Novel Transdisciplinary Integrative Approach to High Impact Chronic Pain in Vermont (2024) · cites this paper as [7]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain—United States, 2016
Dowell, D., Haegerich, T. M., & Chou, R. (2016) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.1464 · Cited by 5,161
Self-citationCDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain — United States, 2016
Dowell, D., Haegerich, T. M., & Chou, R. (2016) · MMWR. Recommendations and Reports · doi:10.15585/mmwr.rr6501e1 · Cited by 2,697
Self-citationBohnert, A. S. B., Guy, G. P., & Losby, J. L. (2018) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m18-1243 · Cited by 420
Kroenke, K., Alford, D. P., Argoff, C. E., Canlas, B. R., Covington, E. C., Frank, J. W., Haake, K. J., Hanling, S. R., Hooten, W. M., Kertesz, S. G., et al. (2018) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1093/pm/pny307 · Cited by 221
Changing the Conversation About Opioid Tapering
Dowell, D., & Haegerich, T. M. (2017) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m17-1402 · Cited by 29
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–407 of 407
Chen, C., & Suputtitada, A. (2026) · Frontiers in Pain Research · doi:10.3389/fpain.2026.1674951
Hackworth, J. C., Schneider, J. E., Valle, M. L. D., Fam, D. S., Ohsfeldt, R. L., Offidani, E., & Potenziano, J. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1824038
Quinn, P. D., Meraz, R., Mazurenko, O., Chang, Z., Sjölander, A., Medlin, A. R., Hirsh, A. T., Pujol, T. A., Kroenke, K., & D'Onofrio, B. M. (2026) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-026-10587-0
Factors associated with chronic pain clinical decision support use in primary care
McCord, E., Apathy, N. C., Blackburn, J. L., Holmes, A. M., Sanner, L. M., Harle, C. A., & Mazurenko, O. (2026) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0001032
Playing by the Rules: A Review of the Modern Regulatory Framework for Regenerative Medicine
Rothkrug, A., & Robinson, C. L. (2026) · Current Pain and Headache Reports · doi:10.1007/s11916-026-01558-5
Tseregounis, I. E., Shin, E., Henry, S. G., & Delcher, C. (2026) · JAMIA Open · doi:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooag192
McCord, E., Blackburn, J. L., Holmes, A. M., Apathy, N. C., Grout, R. W., Harle, C. A., & Mazurenko, O. (2026) · medRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.10.07.26364970
Metadata
- Authors
- Dowell, D., Haegerich, T., & Chou, R.
- Affiliations
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2019-06-13
- Volume
- 380
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 2285-2287
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- PMC
- PMC6573011
- OpenAlex
- W2941323238
- Cited by
- 408
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 113 · 2019: 38
- FWCI
- 63.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
- Keywords
- opioid prescribing, chronic pain, guideline implementation, opioid safety, prescription drug monitoring programs
- MeSH terms
- Analgesics, Opioid, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S., Consensus Statements as Topic, Humans, Opioid-Related Disorders, Practice Patterns, Physicians', United States, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Pain Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
