Cited by 408Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentPain Management and Opioid UsePharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

No Shortcuts to Safer Opioid Prescribing

Open access
Dowell, Deborah, Haegerich, Tamara, Chou, Roger·2019·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

No Shortcuts to Safer Opioid Prescribing The CDC’s 2016 Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain has largely been embraced by the medical and health policy communities. Unfortunately, some policies and practices purportedly derived from the guideline have been inconsistent with its recommendations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmp1904190

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tapering opioids can have unintended consequences including acute opioid withdrawal, uncontrolled pain, and even suicide.

    “Clinicians should also be aware of unintended conse quences of tapering opioids - including acute opioid withdrawal, uncontrolled pain, and even suicide - and balance the risks and benefits of continued opioid use 303 .”

    From Substance use disorders: a comprehensive update of classification, epidemiology, neurobiology, clinical aspects, treatment and prevention (2023) · cites this paper as [303]

    In “No Shortcuts to Safer Opioid Prescribing” (page not provided), the authors warn that tapering may bring withdrawal symptoms and increased pain, particularly if dosages are reduced abruptly. They discuss adverse psychological outcomes but do not identify suicide as a consequence. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Incautious tapering can do harm, shaking patient confidence and reducing the chance of successful deprescribing, and should not be imposed.

    “In order for the process to be successful, patients require a clear commitment to stop opioids and need considerable support; 5 incautious tapering can do harm, shaking patient confidence and reducing the chance of successful deprescribing and should not be imposed.12,13”

    From Tapering and withdrawing opioids: guidance informed by fundamental principles to minimise withdrawal symptoms (2025) · cites this paper as [13]

    The paper’s main text (page unavailable) warns that abrupt tapering can cause psychological and physical harm and recommends collaborating with patients who agree to taper. It does not specifically say that incautious tapering shakes patient confidence or reduces the chance of successful deprescribing. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The time taken for patients to taper off opioids is highly variable.

    “There is also consensus on the observation that the time taken for patients to taper off opioids is highly variable, with some patients requiring months or years to successfully stop opioids, especially when use has been prolonged.5,13”
  • Some patients require months or years to successfully stop opioids, especially when use has been prolonged.

    “There is also consensus on the observation that the time taken for patients to taper off opioids is highly variable, with some patients requiring months or years to successfully stop opioids, especially when use has been prolonged.5,13”
  • The CDC guideline calls for maximizing use of physical, psychological, and multimodal pain treatments, which have not been available, used, or reimbursed sufficiently.

    “In 2019, Dowel et al published a commentary that re-emphasized that the CDC guideline calls for maximizing use of physical, psychological, and multimodal pain treatments, which have not been available, used, or reimbursed sufficiently. 7”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dowell, D., Haegerich, T., & Chou, R.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2019-06-13
Volume
380
Issue
24
Pages
2285-2287
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2941323238
Cited by
408
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 113 · 2019: 38
FWCI
63.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
opioid prescribing, chronic pain, guideline implementation, opioid safety, prescription drug monitoring programs
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Opioid, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S., Consensus Statements as Topic, Humans, Opioid-Related Disorders, Practice Patterns, Physicians', United States, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review