Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 613

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genomics and Drug Response

Open access
Wang, Liewei, McLeod, Howard L., Weinshilboum, Richard M.·2011·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

harmacogenomics is the study of the role of inherited and acquired genetic variation in drug response.1 Clinically relevant pharmacogenetic examples, mainly involving drug metabolism, have been known for decades, but recently, the field of pharmacogenetics has evolved into "pharmacogenomics," involving a shift from a focus on individual candidate genes to genomewide association studies.Such studies are based on a rapid scan of markers across the genome of persons affected by a particular disorder or drug-response phenotype and persons who are not affected, with tests for association that compare genetic variation in a case-control setting. 2 An example is provided in this issue of the Journal: McCormack and colleagues, testing for genomewide association, identified an HLA allele that is associated with hypersensitivity reactions to the anticonvulsant and mood-stabilizing drug carbamazepine in persons of European descent.3 Pharmacogenomics facilitates the identification of biomarkers that can help physicians optimize drug selection, dose, and treatment duration and avert adverse drug reactions.In addition, pharmacogenomics can provide new insights into mechanisms of drug action and as a result can contribute to the development of new therapeutic agents.In 2003, two reviews of pharmacogenetics were published the Journal.4,5 Since then, both genomic science and its application to drug response have undergone major advances.6 Here we review some of those advances, with an emphasis on discovery through genomewide association studies.We describe examples that highlight principles of pharmacogenomics that are relevant to a wide variety of drugs.The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has altered drug labels and issued warnings about pharmacogenomic variation affecting drug response, raising the issue of the level of evidence required to show clinical utility 7 and the respective roles of regulatory agencies such as the FDA and of academic and professional societies in the evaluation of pharmacogenetic analyses for the clinic. C a r diova scul a r DrugsMany drugs have proven efficacy in the treatment and prevention of cardiovascular disease.Not uncommonly, these drugs have narrow therapeutic indexes that are influenced by genetic variation -a hallmark of drugs for which pharmacogenomic approaches are likely to provide substantial clinical benefit.The anticoagulant agents warfarin and clopidogrel are high on the list of widely prescribed cardiovascular drugs with narrow therapeutic indexes.The pharmacogenomic features of these drugs illustrate the rapid evolution of our understanding of the role of inheritance in the variation in drug efficacy and the risk of adverse drug reactions.In the case of both agents, the application of classic candidate-gene pharmacogeneticsThe New England

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmra1010600

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 613

Metadata

Authors
Wang, L., McLeod, H. L., & Weinshilboum, R. M.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2011-03-24
Volume
364
Issue
12
Pages
1144-1153
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2102316672
Cited by
613
References
6
FWCI
81.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genomics and Drug Response. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmra1010600
The paper
Wang, L., McLeod, H. L., & Weinshilboum, R. M. (2011). Genomics and Drug Response. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmra1010600

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.