Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 276

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

PG4KDS: A model for the clinical implementation of pre‐emptive pharmacogenetics

Open access
Hoffman, James M., Haidar, Cyrine E., Wilkinson, Mark R., Crews, Kristine R., Baker, Donald K., Kornegay, Nancy M., Yang, Wenjian, Pui, Ching‐Hon, Reiss, Ulrike M., Gaur, Aditya H., Howard, Scott C., Evans, William E., Broeckel, Ulrich, Relling, Mary V.·2014·American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics

Abstract

Pharmacogenetics is frequently cited as an area for initial focus of the clinical implementation of genomics. Through the PG4KDS protocol, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital pre‐emptively genotypes patients for 230 genes using the Affymetrix Drug Metabolizing Enzymes and Transporters (DMET) Plus array supplemented with a CYP2D6 copy number assay. The PG4KDS protocol provides a rational, stepwise process for implementing gene/drug pairs, organizing data, and obtaining consent from patients and families. Through August 2013, 1,559 patients have been enrolled, and four gene tests have been released into the electronic health record (EHR) for clinical implementation: TPMT, CYP2D6, SLCO1B1, and CYP2C19. These genes are coupled to 12 high‐risk drugs. Of the 1,016 patients with genotype test results available, 78% of them had at least one high‐risk (i.e., actionable) genotype result placed in their EHR. Each diplotype result released to the EHR is coupled with an interpretive consult that is created in a concise, standardized format. To support‐gene based prescribing at the point of care, 55 interruptive clinical decision support (CDS) alerts were developed. Patients are informed of their genotyping result and its relevance to their medication use through a letter. Key elements necessary for our successful implementation have included strong institutional support, a knowledgeable clinical laboratory, a process to manage any incidental findings, a strategy to educate clinicians and patients, a process to return results, and extensive use of informatics, especially CDS. Our approach to pre‐emptive clinical pharmacogenetics has proven feasible, clinically useful, and scalable. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajmg.c.31391

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Hoffman, J. M., Haidar, C. E., Wilkinson, M. R., Crews, K. R., Baker, D. K., Kornegay, N. M., Yang, W., Pui, C., Reiss, U. M., Gaur, A. H., Howard, S. C., Evans, W. E., Broeckel, U., & Relling, M. V.
Venue
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-03
Volume
166
Issue
1
Pages
45-55
ISSN
  • 1552-4868 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4876
OpenAlex
W1513910469
Cited by
276
References
28
FWCI
30.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PG4KDS: A model for the clinical implementation of pre‐emptive pharmacogenetics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ajmg.c.31391
The paper
Hoffman, J. M., Haidar, C. E., Wilkinson, M. R., Crews, K. R., Baker, D. K., Kornegay, N. M., Yang, W., Pui, C., Reiss, U. M., Gaur, A. H., Howard, S. C., Evans, W. E., Broeckel, U., & Relling, M. V. (2014). PG4KDS: A model for the clinical implementation of pre‐emptive pharmacogenetics. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.31391

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.