The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diagnostic Criteria for Nonviable Pregnancy Early in the First Trimester
Open accessAbstract
Determining the viability of a pregnancy is a major challenge, especially with a pregnancy of unknown location. This review provides specific guidance, including stringent criteria for nonviability, that can reduce the risk of inadvertent harm to a potentially normal pregnancy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Barnhart, K. T. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmcp0810384 · Cited by 512
Comparison of pregnancy dating by last menstrual period, ultrasound scanning, and their combination
Savitz, D. A., Terry, J. W., Dole, N., Thorp, J. M., Siega-Riz, A. M., & Herring, A. H. (2002) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1067/mob.2002.127601 · Cited by 437
Pregnancy of unknown location: a consensus statement of nomenclature, definitions, and outcome
Barnhart, K., van Mello, N. M., Bourne, T., Kirk, E., Van Calster, B., Bottomley, C., Chung, K., Condous, G., Goldstein, S., Hajenius, P. J., et al. (2011) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.09.006 · Cited by 343
Self-citationTrends in Ectopic Pregnancy Mortality in the United States: 1980–2007
Creanga, A. A., Shapiro-Mendoza, C. K., Bish, C. L., Zane, S., Berg, C. J., & Callaghan, W. M. (2011) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e3182113c10 · Cited by 280
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 101: Ultrasonography in Pregnancy
(2009) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e31819930b0 · Cited by 193
Lindsay, D. J., Lovett, I. S., Lyons, E. A., Levi, C. S., Zheng, X. H., Holt, S. C., & Dashefsky, S. M. (1992) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.183.1.1549656 · Cited by 163
Abdallah, Y., Daemen, A., Kirk, E., Pexsters, A., Naji, O., Stalder, C. M., Gould, D., Ahmed, S., Guha, S., Syed, S., et al. (2011) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.10109 · Cited by 149
Self-citationTransvaginal sonography in the evaluation of normal early pregnancy: correlation with HCG level
Bree, R. L., Edwards, M., Böhm-Vélez, M., Beyler, S. A., Roberts, J., & Mendelson, E. B. (1989) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.153.1.75 · Cited by 136
Small sac size in the first trimester: a predictor of poor fetal outcome.
Bromley, B., Harlow, B. L., Laboda, L. A., & Benacerraf, B. R. (1991) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.178.2.1987595 · Cited by 124
Early diagnosis of nonviable pregnancy with endovaginal US.
Levi, C. S., Lyons, E. A., & Lindsay, D. J. (1988) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.167.2.3282258 · Cited by 121
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e5e2ec · doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e3181e5e2ec
- 10.1177/0272989X8300300206 · doi:10.1177/0272989x8300300206
- 10.1002/uog.9113 · doi:10.1002/uog.9113
- Goldstein I, 1991, Obstet Gynecol, 77, 885
- 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063730 · doi:10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063730
- Benson CB, 2013, J Ultrasound Med, 32, 389, 10.7863/jum.2013.32.3.389 · doi:10.7863/jum.2013.32.3.389
- 10.1002/jcu.1870070212 · doi:10.1002/jcu.1870070212
- 10.1148/radiology.189.3.8234696 · doi:10.1148/radiology.189.3.8234696
- Goldstein SR, 1992, Obstet Gynecol, 80, 670
- Pennell RG, 1991, J Ultrasound Med, 10, 63, 10.7863/jum.1991.10.2.63 · doi:10.7863/jum.1991.10.2.63
- 2010, J Ultrasound Med, 29, 166, 10.7863/jum.2010.29.1.166 · doi:10.7863/jum.2010.29.1.166
- 10.1016/j.emc.2004.04.005 · doi:10.1016/j.emc.2004.04.005
- Deutchman M, 2009, Am Fam Physician, 79, 985
- 10.1016/0020-7292(94)90409-X · doi:10.1016/0020-7292(94)90409-x
- Yegul NT, 2010, J Clin Ultrasound, 38, 113, 10.1002/jcu.20673 · doi:10.1002/jcu.20673
- 10.1093/humrep/dem073 · doi:10.1093/humrep/dem073
- 10.1002/uog.2636 · doi:10.1002/uog.2636
- Kadar N, 1981, Obstet Gynecol, 58, 156
- 10.2214/ajr.153.1.75 · DOI
- 10.1016/0002-9378(88)90039-7 · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(88)90039-7
- Bateman BG, 1990, Obstet Gynecol, 75, 421
- 10.1148/radiology.205.2.9356647 · doi:10.1148/radiology.205.2.9356647
- 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318278f421 · doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e318278f421
- 10.1093/humrep/den221 · doi:10.1093/humrep/den221
- 10.1576/toag.10.4.224.27438 · doi:10.1576/toag.10.4.224.27438
- Galstyan K, 2006, Int J Fertil Womens Med, 51, 14
Cited by
Quenby, S., Gallos, I. D., Dhillon-Smith, R. K., Podesek, M., Stephenson, M. D., Fisher, J., Brosens, J. J., Brewin, J., Ramhorst, R., Lucas, E. S., et al. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00682-6 · Cited by 1,560
Self-citationKolte, A. M., Bernardi, L. A., Christiansen, O. B., Quenby, S., Farquharson, R. G., Goddijn, M., Stephenson, M. D., & on behalf of the ESHRE Special Interest Group, E. P. (2015) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deu299 · Cited by 386
Practice Bulletin No. 175: Ultrasound in Pregnancy
(2016) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000001815 · Cited by 282
(2018) · Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine · doi:10.1002/jum.14831 · Cited by 216
Moore, K. A., Simpson, J. A., Paw, M. K., Pimanpanarak, M., Wiladphaingern, J., Rijken, M. J., Jittamala, P., White, N. J., Fowkes, F. J. I., Nosten, F., et al. (2016) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(15)00547-2 · Cited by 84
Metadata
- Authors
- Doubilet, P. M., Benson, C. B., Bourne, T., & Blaivas, M.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2013-10-10
- Volume
- 369
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 1443-1451
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2074481438
- Cited by
- 414
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 29.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnostic Criteria for Nonviable Pregnancy Early in the First Trimester. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmra1302417
- The paper
- Doubilet, P. M., Benson, C. B., Bourne, T., & Blaivas, M. (2013). Diagnostic Criteria for Nonviable Pregnancy Early in the First Trimester. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmra1302417
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
