Cited by 2,774Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchSmoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Adverse health effects of marijuana use.

Open access
Volkow, Nora D., Baler, Ruben D., Compton, Wilson M., Weiss, Susan R.B.·2014·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

As marijuana use becomes legal in some states, the dominant public opinion is that marijuana is a harmless source of mood alteration. Although the harms associated with marijuana use have not been well studied, enough information is available to cause concern.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmra1402309

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cannabis dependence is reported in 4-9% of users.

    “Potential cannabis dependence (reported in 4–9% of users) (Anthony et al., 1994; Volkow et al., 2014)”

    From Self-management strategies to consider to combat endometriosis symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020) · cites this paper as Volkow et al., 2014

    The Risk of Addiction section reports that approximately 9% of people who experiment with marijuana become addicted under DSM-IV dependence criteria. It does not report a 4% estimate or a 4–9% range, so it supports only the upper end of the cited figure. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Effects of short-term THC use include memory and cognitive deficits, impaired motor coordination, and psychosis.

    “Effects of short-term use include memory and cognitive deficits, impaired motor coordination, and psychosis.”

    From Cannabis sativa: The Plant of the Thousand and One Molecules (2016) · cites this paper as Volkow et al., 2014

    The Conclusions (page unavailable) say that marijuana intoxication can impair memory and motor coordination, and the section on school performance says cognitive impairment can occur during acute intoxication. The Relation to Mental Illness section links marijuana to psychoses, particularly in genetically vulnerable people, but does not identify psychosis as an effect of short-term use and cautions that causality is difficult to establish. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • High levels of cannabis use are associated with negative consequences, such as poor educational attainment, cognitive impairment, anxiety, and depression.

    “High levels of cannabis use are also associated with negative consequences, such as poor educational attainment, cognitive impairment, anxiety, and depression (Hall & Degenhardt, 2009; Volkow et al., 2014).”
  • Frequent cannabis use is associated with higher levels of depression and anxiety.

    “Likewise, frequent cannabis use has been associated with higher levels of depression and anxiety (Degenhardt et al., 2003; Fergusson & Boden, 2008; Volkow et al., 2014)”
  • Long-term use of THC has been associated to an increased risk of addiction, cognitive impairment, altered brain development when initial use was done early in adolescence, and an increased risk of chronic psychosis disorder including schizophrenia.

    “Long-term use of THC has been associated to an increased risk of addiction, cognitive impairment, altered brain development when initial use was done early in adolescence, and an increased risk of chronic psychosis disorder including schizophrenia.”

    From Cannabis sativa: The Plant of the Thousand and One Molecules (2016) · cites this paper as Volkow et al., 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 76 · Cited by 2,774

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [50]ElSohly MA Potency Monitoring Program quarterly report no 123 — reporting period: 09/16/2013-12/15/2013 Oxford University of Mississippi, National Center for Natural Products Research 2014
  2. [51]Drug Abuse Warning Network, 2011: national estimates of drug-related emergency department visits Rockville, MD Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration 2011 http://www.samhsa.gov/data/2k13/DAWN2k11ED/DAWN2k11ED.htm 27631059

Authors
Volkow, N. D., Baler, R. D., Compton, W. M., & Weiss, S. R. B.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2014-06-05
Volume
370
Issue
23
Pages
2219-2227
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2140616116
Cited by
2,774
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 119 · 2025: 175 · 2024: 185 · 2023: 187 · 2022: 234 · 2021: 280 · 2020: 312 · 2019: 333 · 2018: 289 · 2017: 224 · 2016: 244 · 2015: 154 · 2014: 36
FWCI
28.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (Z99 DA999999)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
cannabis use, cannabis, adverse health effects, public opinion, legalization, mood changes
MeSH terms
Accidents, Traffic, Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Brain, Cannabinoids, Cannabis, Marijuana Abuse, Humans, Lung Diseases, Marijuana Smoking, Dronabinol, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review