Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 755

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Metrics of the Physician Brain Drain

Mullan, Fitzhugh·2005·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There has been substantial immigration of physicians to developed countries, much of it coming from lower-income countries. Although the recipient nations and the immigrating physicians benefit from this migration, less developed countries lose important health capabilities as a result of the loss of physicians. METHODS: Data on the countries of origin, based on countries of medical education, of international medical graduates practicing in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia were obtained from sources in the respective countries and analyzed separately and in aggregate. With the use of World Health Organization data, I computed an emigration factor for the countries of origin of the immigrant physicians to provide a relative measure of the number of physicians lost by emigration. RESULTS: International medical graduates constitute between 23 and 28 percent of physicians in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia, and lower-income countries supply between 40 and 75 percent of these international medical graduates. India, the Philippines, and Pakistan are the leading sources of international medical graduates. The United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia draw a substantial number of physicians from South Africa, and the United States draws very heavily from the Philippines. Nine of the 20 countries with the highest emigration factors are in sub-Saharan Africa or the Caribbean. CONCLUSIONS: Reliance on international medical graduates in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia is reducing the supply of physicians in many lower-income countries.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmsa050004

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Mejia A, 1976, WHO Chron, 30, 455
  2. 10.1001/jama.1995.03520430057039 · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520430057039
  3. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.01.006 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17482-5 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1136/bmj.324.7336.499 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Stilwell B, 2004, Bull World Health Organ, 82, 595
  7. 10.1136/bmj.327.7420.926 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02492-2 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)72896-8 · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)72896-8
  10. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16108-4 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Habte D, 2004, World Hosp Health Serv, 40, 23
  12. 10.1186/1478-4491-2-13 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Ehman A, 2001, CMAJ, 164, 387
  14. Birrell B, 2004, People Place, 12, 83
  15. 10.7326/0003-4819-141-9-200411020-00012 · DOI

Cited by

See all 755

Metadata

Authors
Mullan, F.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2005-10-27
Volume
353
Issue
17
Pages
1810-1818
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W1973097985
Cited by
755
References
0
FWCI
79.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Metrics of the Physician Brain Drain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmsa050004
The paper
Mullan, F. (2005). The Metrics of the Physician Brain Drain. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsa050004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.