The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A National Survey of Physician–Industry Relationships
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Relationships between physicians and pharmaceutical, medical device, and other medically related industries have received considerable attention in recent years. We surveyed physicians to collect information about their financial associations with industry and the factors that predict those associations. METHODS: We conducted a national survey of 3167 physicians in six specialties (anesthesiology, cardiology, family practice, general surgery, internal medicine, and pediatrics) in late 2003 and early 2004. The raw response rate for this probability sample was 52%, and the weighted response rate was 58%. RESULTS: Most physicians (94%) reported some type of relationship with the pharmaceutical industry, and most of these relationships involved receiving food in the workplace (83%) or receiving drug samples (78%). More than one third of the respondents (35%) received reimbursement for costs associated with professional meetings or continuing medical education, and more than one quarter (28%) received payments for consulting, giving lectures, or enrolling patients in trials. Cardiologists were more than twice as likely as family practitioners to receive payments. Family practitioners met more frequently with industry representatives than did physicians in other specialties, and physicians in solo, two-person, or group practices met more frequently with industry representatives than did physicians practicing in hospitals and clinics. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this national survey indicate that relationships between physicians and industry are common and underscore the variation among such relationships according to specialty, practice type, and professional activities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Physicians and the Pharmaceutical Industry: Is a Gift Ever Just a Gift?
Wazana, A. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.3.373 · Cited by 1,415
The truth about the drug companies: how they deceive us and what to do about it
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-5297 · Cited by 885
Uneasy alliance—clinical investigators and the pharmaceutical industry
Bodenheimer, T. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200005183422024 · Cited by 765
Brennan, T. A., Rothman, D. J., Blank, L., Blumenthal, D., Chimonas, S. C., Cohen, J. J., Goldman, J., Kassirer, J. P., Kimball, H., Naughton, J., et al. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.295.4.429 · Cited by 695
Self-citationData Withholding in Academic Genetics: Evidence From a National Survey
Campbell, E. G., Clarridge, B. R., Gokhale, M., Birenbaum, L., Hilgartner, S., Holtzman, N. A., & Blumenthal, D. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.287.4.473 · Cited by 489
Self-citationRelationships between Academic Institutions and Industry in the Life Sciences — An Industry Survey
Blumenthal, D., Causino, N., Campbell, E., & Louis, K. S. (1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199602083340606 · Cited by 401
Self-citationBlumenthal, D. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmhpr042734 · Cited by 238
Self-citationOn the Take: How Medicine’s Complicity with Big Business Can Endanger your Health
Rolla, V. C., & de Oliveira, M. S. (2008) · Americanae (AECID Library) · doi:10.3395/reciis.v2i2.859 · Cited by 204
Studdert, D. M., Mello, M. M., & Brennan, T. A. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmlim042229 · Cited by 195
Powerful medicines: the benefits, risks, and costs of prescription drugs
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-5297a · Cited by 191
Cited by
A Randomized Study of How Physicians Interpret Research Funding Disclosures
Kesselheim, A. S., Robertson, C. T., Myers, J. A., Rose, S. L., Gillet, V., Ross, K. M., Glynn, R. J., Joffe, S., & Avorn, J. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa1202397 · Cited by 183
Off-Label Use vs Off-Label Marketing of Drugs
Van Norman, G. A. (2023) · JACC: Basic to Translational Science · doi:10.1016/j.jacbts.2022.12.011 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Campbell, E. G., Gruen, R. L., Mountford, J., Miller, L. G., Cleary, P. D., & Blumenthal, D.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2007-04-26
- Volume
- 356
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 1742-1750
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2157918628
- Cited by
- 553
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 44.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A National Survey of Physician–Industry Relationships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmsa064508
- The paper
- Campbell, E. G., Gruen, R. L., Mountford, J., Miller, L. G., Cleary, P. D., & Blumenthal, D. (2007). A National Survey of Physician–Industry Relationships. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsa064508
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.