The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Advance Directives and Outcomes of Surrogate Decision Making before Death
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Recent discussions about health care reform have raised questions regarding the value of advance directives. METHODS: We used data from survey proxies in the Health and Retirement Study involving adults 60 years of age or older who had died between 2000 and 2006 to determine the prevalence of the need for decision making and lost decision-making capacity and to test the association between preferences documented in advance directives and outcomes of surrogate decision making. RESULTS: Of 3746 subjects, 42.5% required decision making, of whom 70.3% lacked decision-making capacity and 67.6% of those subjects, in turn, had advance directives. Subjects who had living wills were more likely to want limited care (92.7%) or comfort care (96.2%) than all care possible (1.9%); 83.2% of subjects who requested limited care and 97.1% of subjects who requested comfort care received care consistent with their preferences. Among the 10 subjects who requested all care possible, only 5 received it; however, subjects who requested all care possible were far more likely to receive aggressive care as compared with those who did not request it (adjusted odds ratio, 22.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.45 to 115.00). Subjects with living wills were less likely to receive all care possible (adjusted odds ratio, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.56) than were subjects without living wills. Subjects who had assigned a durable power of attorney for health care were less likely to die in a hospital (adjusted odds ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.93) or receive all care possible (adjusted odds ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.86) than were subjects who had not assigned a durable power of attorney for health care. CONCLUSIONS: Between 2000 and 2006, many elderly Americans needed decision making near the end of life at a time when most lacked the capacity to make decisions. Patients who had prepared advance directives received care that was strongly associated with their preferences. These findings support the continued use of advance directives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Brown BA, 2003, J Gerontol Nurs, 29, 4, 10.3928/0098-9134-20030901-04 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01045.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/3527683 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1056/NEJM199002013220506 · DOI · Paper page
- Schneiderman LJ, 1992, Ann Intern Med, 117, 599, 10.7326/0003-4819-117-7-599 · DOI · Paper page
- Teno JM, 1994, J Clin Ethics, 5, 23, 10.1086/JCE199405106 · DOI
- 10.1001/archinte.145.6.1115 · DOI
- 10.1097/00003246-199804000-00018 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJM199103283241304 · DOI · Paper page
- Degenholtz HB, 2004, Ann Intern Med, 141, 113, 10.7326/0003-4819-141-2-200407200-00009 · DOI
- 10.2307/146277 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/geronb/52B.Special_Issue.1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jama.267.1.59 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.291.1.88 · DOI · Paper page
- Smucker WD, 1993, J Am Board Fam Pract, 6, 473
- Edinger W, 1992, J Fam Pract, 35, 650
- 10.1016/S0885-3924(01)00334-7 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Spruit, M. A., Singh, S. J., Garvey, C., ZuWallack, R., Nici, L., Rochester, C., Hill, K., Holland, A. E., Lareau, S. C., Man, W. D.-C., et al. (2013) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201309-1634st · Cited by 3,938
Sudore, R. L., Lum, H. D., You, J. J., Hanson, L. C., Meier, D. E., Pantilat, S. Z., Matlock, D. D., Rietjens, J. A. C., Korfage, I. J., Ritchie, C. S., et al. (2017) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.12.331 · Cited by 1,726
“The panel recognized that many patients retain their decision making capacity at the end of life.(1) Therefore, patient preparation, through self-reflection and communication of values and goals, helps to clarify care preferences both for the patient as they subsequently face important decisions and the surrogate as t…”
BackgroundThe effects of advance care planning on end-of-life care: A systematic review
Brinkman-Stoppelenburg, A., Rietjens, J. A., & van der Heide, A. (2014) · Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1177/0269216314526272 · Cited by 1,480
Communication About Serious Illness Care Goals: A Review and Synthesis of Best Practices
Bernacki, R. E., & Block, S. D. (2014) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5271 · Cited by 1,422
Rietjens, J. A. C., Sudore, R. L., Connolly, M., van Delden, J. J., Drickamer, M. A., Droger, M., van der Heide, A., Heyland, D. K., Houttekier, D., Janssen, D. J. A., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30582-x · Cited by 1,371
Metadata
- Authors
- Silveira, M. J., Kim, S. Y. H., & Langa, K. M.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 362
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1211-1218
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2153738735
- Cited by
- 1,292
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 73.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advance Directives and Outcomes of Surrogate Decision Making before Death. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmsa0907901
- The paper
- Silveira, M. J., Kim, S. Y. H., & Langa, K. M. (2010). Advance Directives and Outcomes of Surrogate Decision Making before Death. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsa0907901
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.