Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 266

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Paying Physicians for High-Quality Care

Epstein, Arnold M., Lee, Thomas H., Hamel, Mary Beth·2004·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Payment incentives as a part of physicians' compensation are commonplace but have been aimed predominantly at restricting expensive services. A novel concept is the payment of physicians for providing high-quality care, on the basis of explicit measures of quality. Such a system has recently been adopted in the United Kingdom. The authors believe that the idea is worth pursuing, but they point out important impediments and challenges to its successful implementation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmsb035374

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 266

Metadata

Authors
Epstein, A. M., Lee, T. H., & Hamel, M. B.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2004-01-22
Volume
350
Issue
4
Pages
406-410
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2048082566
Cited by
266
References
3
FWCI
67.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Paying Physicians for High-Quality Care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmsb035374
The paper
Epstein, A. M., Lee, T. H., & Hamel, M. B. (2004). Paying Physicians for High-Quality Care. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsb035374

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.