Cited by 1,544Electronic Health Records SystemsPatient Safety and Medication ErrorsTechnology and Human Factors in Education and Health

Improving Safety with Information Technology

Open access
Bates, David W., Gawande, Atul A.·2003·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

ealth care is growing increasingly complex, and most clinical research focuses on new approaches to diagnosis and treatment.In contrast, relatively little effort has been targeted at the perfection of operational systems, which are partly responsible for the well-documented problems with medical safety. 1 If medicine is to achieve major gains in quality, it must be transformed, and information technology will play a key part, 2 especially with respect to safety.In other industries, information technology has made possible what has been called "mass customization" -the efficient and reliable production of goods and services according to the highly personalized needs of individual customers. 2Computer retailers, for example, now use their Web sites to allow people to purchase computers built to their exact specifications, which can be shipped within two days.Medical care is, of course, orders of magnitude more complex than selling personal computers, and clinicians have always strived to provide carefully individualized care.However, safe care now requires a degree of individualization that is becoming unimaginable without computerized decision support.For example, computer systems can instantaneously identify interactions among a patient's medications.Even today, more than 600 drugs require adjustment of doses for multiple levels of renal dysfunction, a task that is poorly performed by human prescribers without assistance but can be done accurately by computers. 3][5][6] In the past decade, the risk of harm caused by medical care has received increasing scrutiny. 1The growing sophistication of computers and software should allow information technology to play a vital part in reducing that risk -by streamlining care, catching and correcting errors, assisting with decisions, and providing feedback on performance.Given the large potential risks and benefits as well as the costs involved, in this article we analyze what is known about the role and effect of information technology with respect to safety and consider the implications for medical care, research, and policy.Information technology can reduce the rate of errors in three ways: by preventing errors and adverse events, by facilitating a more rapid response after an adverse event has occurred, and by tracking and providing feedback about adverse events.][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] The main classes of strategies for preventing errors and adverse events include tools that can improve communication, make knowledge more readily accessible, require key pieces of information (such as the dose of a drug), assist with calculations, perform checks in real time, assist with monitoring, and provide decision support.h ways that information technology can reduce errors

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmsa020847

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using information technology (IT) and adopting electronic medical records (EMR) can significantly improve the quality of information transfer and reduce failures in several of the pathways we have described.

    “Using information technology (IT) and adopting electronic medical records (EMR) can significantly improve the quality of information transfer38,39 and reduce failures in several of the pathways we have described.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Evans RS, Pestotnik SL, Classen DC, et al. A computer-assisted management pro- The New England Journal of Medicine Downloaded from nejm.org on August 29, 2023. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright © 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. n engl j med 348;25
  2. www.nejm.org june 19 , 2003 2534 improving safety with information technology gram for antibiotics and other antiinfective agents. N Engl J Med 1998;338:232-8.
  3. Tate KE, Gardner RM, Weaver LK. A com- puterized laboratory alerting system. MD Comput 1990;7:296-301.
  4. Kuperman G, Teich J, Bates DW. Improv- ing care with computerized alerts and remind- ers. Assoc Health Serv Res 1997;14:224-5. abstract.
  5. Teich JM, Merchia PR, Schmiz JL, Kuper- man GJ, Spurr C, Bates DW. Effects of com- puterized physician order entry on prescrib- ing practices. Arch Intern Med 2000;160: 2741-7.
  6. Kok MR, Boon ME. Consequences of neural network technology for cervical screen- ing: increase in diagnostic consistency and positive scores. Cancer 1996;78:112-7.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bates, D. W., & Gawande, A. A.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2003-06-19
Volume
348
Issue
25
Pages
2526-2534
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2103120311
Cited by
1,544
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 91 · 2014: 87 · 2013: 168 · 2012: 91
FWCI
165.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (P01HS11534)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Technology and Human Factors in Education and Health
Keywords
health information technology, medical safety, medical errors, adverse events, decision support system, renal dose adjustment, error prevention, patient safety, quality of care
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Attitude to Computers, Communication, Humans, Medical Informatics Applications, Medication Errors, Monitoring, Physiologic, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Safety Management, Medical Errors, Decision Support Systems, Clinical, Computers, Handheld

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review