CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 23Language, Discourse, Communication StrategiesEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningLinguistics and Language Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Tracking Change Over Time in Storytelling Practices: A Longitudinal Study of Second Language Talk-in-Interaction

Berger, Evelyne, Pekarek Doehler, Simona·2018·Longitudinal Studies on the Organization of Social Interaction
DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-57007-9_3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We present a longitudinal case study of a second language speaker’s changing storytelling practices over a period of nine months while interacting with her host family. We focus on how the storyteller moves the telling toward a recognizable end and, jointly with the recipient, engages in closing down the storytelling sequence. Results show an increased use of resources to anticipate the story climax, to recognizably display the story ending and to manifest the speaker’s stance; results also reveal how co-participants orient to such change in accountable ways. We discuss to what extent the documentable change can be interpreted as pertaining the speaker’s increased second language interactional competence and how it is indexically related to the changing local circumstances of the interactions at hand and tied to larger processes of socialization as the people move through time.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/978-1-137-57007-9_3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Bolden, G., Mandelbaum, J., & Wilkinson, S. (2012). Pursuing a response by repairing an indexical reference. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(2), 137–155. · DOI
  2. Brouwer, C. E., & Wagner, J. (2004). Developmental issues in second language conversation. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 29–47. · DOI
  3. Drew, P., & Chilton, K. (2000). Calling just to keep in touch: Regular and habitualised telephone calls as an environment for small talk. In J. Coupland (Ed.), Small talk (pp. 137–162). Pearson Education Limited: Harlow.
  4. Drew, P., & Holt, E. (1998). Figures of speech: Figurative expressions and the management of topic transition in conversation. Language in Society, 27(4), 495–522. · DOI
  5. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  6. Golato, A. (2012). German Oh: Marking an emotional change of state. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(3), 245–268. · DOI
  7. Goodwin, C. (1984). Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 225–246). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Hellermann, J. (2008). Social actions for classroom language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  10. Heritage, J. (1998). Oh-prefaced responses to inquiry. Language in Society, 27(3), 291–334. · DOI
  11. Holt, E. (2000). Reporting and reacting: Concurrent responses to reported speech. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33(4), 425–454. · DOI
  12. Jefferson, G. (1978). Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 219–248). New York: Academic. · DOI
  13. Jefferson, G. (1979). A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance declination. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 79–96). New York: Irvington.
  14. Koschmann, T. (2013). Conversation analysis and learning in interaction. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1038–1043). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
  15. Mandelbaum, J. (1989). Interpersonal activities in conversational storytelling. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53(2), 114–126. · DOI
  16. Mandelbaum, J. (2013). Storytelling in conversation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 492–507). Chichester: Blackwell Publishing.
  17. Maynard, D. (2003). Bad news, good news: Conversational order in everyday talk and clinical settings. Chicago: University Press.
  18. Mori, J., & Koschmann, T. (2012). Good reasons for seemingly bad performance: Competences at the blackboard and the accountability of a lesson. In G. Rasmussen, C. E. Brouwer, & D. Day (Eds.), Evaluating cognitive competence in interaction (pp. 89–117). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. · DOI
  19. Ochs, E. (1997). Narrative. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as structure and process (pp. 185–207). London: Sage.
  20. Pekarek Doehler, S., & Berger, E. (2016). L2 interactional competence as increased ability for context-sensitive conduct: A longitudinal study of story-openings. Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw021 . · DOI
  21. Pekarek Doehler, S., & Pochon-Berger, E. (2011). Developing “methods” for interaction: Disagreement sequences in French L2. In J. K. Hall, J. Hellermann, & S. Pekarek Doehler (Eds.), L2 interactional competence and development (pp. 206–243). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. · DOI
  22. Pekarek Doehler, S., & Pochon-Berger, E. (2015). The development of L2 interactional competence: Evidence from turn-taking organization, sequence organization, repair organization and preference organization. In T. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 233–268). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. · DOI
  23. Sacks, H. (1974). An analysis of the course of a joke’s telling in conversation. In R. Bauman & J. Sherzer (Eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking (pp. 337–353). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  24. Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation I-II. Oxford: Blackwell.
  25. Schegloff, E. A. (1993). Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26(1), 99–128. · DOI
  26. Schegloff, E. A. (1997). “Narrative analysis” thirty years later. The Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7, 97–107. · DOI
  27. Schegloff, E. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  28. Selting, M. (2010). Affectivity in conversational storytelling: An analysis of displays of anger or indignation in complaint stories. Pragmatics, 20(2), 229–277. · DOI
  29. Stivers, T. (2008). Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(1), 31–57. · DOI
  30. Svennevig, J. (2014). Direct and indirect self-presentation in first conversations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(3), 302–327. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Berger, E., & Pekarek Doehler, S.
Affiliations
University of Neuchâtel (CH)
ORCID
Berger, Evelyne
Venue
Longitudinal Studies on the Organization of Social Interaction
Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan UK
Published
2018
Pages
67-102
DOI
10.1057/978-1-137-57007-9_3
OpenAlex
W2789184388
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
FWCI
17.62
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)
Locations
Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
Keywords
storytelling practices, longitudinal change, speaker stance, interactional competence, socialization, indexicality, second language acquisition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review