Cited by 310EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningLanguage, Discourse, Communication StrategiesMultilingual Education and Policy

Social Actions for Classroom Language Learning

Hellermann, John·2008·Multilingual Matters eBooks

Abstract

Using sociocultural approaches to research on language learning and an extensive corpus of classroom videos made over four years, the book documents language learning as an epiphenomenon of peer face-to-face interaction. The book uses methods from conversation analysis with longitudinal data to document practices for interaction between learners.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21832/9781847690272

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hellermann, J.
Corresponding author
Hellermann, John
Venue
Multilingual Matters eBooks
Published
2008-12-31
OpenAlex
W598342798
Cited by
310
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 26
FWCI
25.13
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Multilingual Matters eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
Keywords
classroom language learning, sociocultural approach, peer interaction, face-to-face interaction, conversation analysis, second language acquisition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review