CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An Appetite for Dogs: Consuming and Loving Them in Vietnam

Podberscek, Anthony L.·2016·Companion Animals in Everyday Life
DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-59572-0_8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Very little has been written on people’s attitudes to dogs in Vietnam. We collected data on this in two ways. First, relevant information on the history and current status of dog use and consumption was sourced from academic literature, newspaper reports, websites, and animal welfare organizations. Second, in 2004, the polling agency Market & Opinion Research International (MORI) was contracted to survey 1000 adults (15 years and above) in the cities of Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City about dogs. Respondents were asked about their attitudes to the roles that dogs played in their society and whether or not they would support a ban on eating certain animals, including dogs. Of the participants, 46 % were male and 54 %female. Fifty-two percent of participants owned pet animals (this was the percentage for both cities): overall, 27 % had dogs, 30 %cats, 5 % a bird, and 6 %pets which were categorized as “other,” for example, fish, guinea pigs, and monkeys. The survey showed that, overall, people were supportive of the use of dogs as pets, assistance animals and guard dogs, but were against the use of dogs as food. In line with this, most would support a ban on the eating of dogs. However, there was a major difference of opinion when residents of the two cities were compared: the majority of people living in the north (Hanoi), as opposed to the south (Ho Chi Minh City) were actually supportive of using dogs for food and would not support a ban on the eating of dogs. These keywords were…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/978-1-137-59572-0_8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Abadie, M. (1924). Les Races du Haut-Tonkin de Phong-Tho à Lang-Son. Paris: Société d’Éditions Géographiques, Maritimes et Coloniales.
  2. Avieli, N. (2011). Dog meat politics in a Vietnamese town. Ethnology, 50, 59–78.
  3. Bökönyi, S. (1974). History of domestic mammals in Central and Eastern Europe. Budapest: Académiai Kaidó.
  4. Clutton-Brock, J., & Hammond, N. (1994). Hot dogs: Comestible canids in Preclassic Maya culture at Cuello, Belize. Journal of Archaeological Science, 21, 819–826. · DOI
  5. Cui, J., & Wang, Z. Q. (2001). Outbreaks of human trichinellosis caused by consumption of dog meat in China. Parasite, 8(2), S74–S77. · DOI
  6. Fox, M. A. (1999). Deep vegetarianism. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
  7. Harris, M. (1985). Good to eat: Riddles of food and culture. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
  8. Herzog, H. A. (1988). The moral status of mice. American Psychologist, 43, 473–474. · DOI
  9. Hopkins, J. (1999). Strange foods: Bush meat, bats, and butterflies. Singapore: Periplus Editions (HK).
  10. Manwell, C., & Baker, C. M. A. (1984). Domestication of the dog: Hunter, food, bed-warmer, or emotional object? Zeitschrift für Tierzüchtung und Züchtungsbiologie, 101, 241–256. · DOI
  11. Massy, A. (1890). Quatorze mois chez les Thos et les Mans-tiens. Bulletin de Géographie Historique et Descriptive, 5, 332–384.
  12. Matalas, A.-L., & Grivetti, L. E. (2007). Non-food food during famine: The Athens famine survivors project. In J. MacClancy, J. Henry, & H. Macbeth (Eds.), Consuming the inedible: Neglected dimensions of food choice (pp. 131–139). New York, NY: Berghahn Books · DOI
  13. Olowo Ojoade, J. (1990). Nigerian cultural attitudes to the dog. In R. G. Willis (Ed.), Signifying animals: Human meaning in the natural world (pp. 215–221). London, England: Unwin Hyman.
  14. Olsen, S. J. (2000). Dogs. In K. F. Kiple & K. C. Ornelas (Eds.), The Cambridge world history of food (Vol. 1, pp. 508–517). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  15. Peters, E. J. (2012). Appetites and aspirations in Vietnam: Food and drink in the long nineteenth century. Plymouth, England: AltaMira Press.
  16. Piper, P. J., Campos, F. Z., Ngoc Kinh, D., Amano, N., Oxenham, M., Chi Hoang, B., et al. (2014). Early evidence for pig and dog husbandry from the Neolithic site of An Son, Southern Vietnam. International Journal of Osteoarcheology, 24, 68–78. · DOI
  17. Podberscek, A. L. (2007). Dogs and cats as food in Asia. In M. Bekoff (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human–animal relationships (Vol. 1, pp. 24–34). London, England: Greenwood Press.
  18. Podberscek, A. L. (2009). Good to pet and eat: The keeping and consuming of dogs and cats in South Korea. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 615–632. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Powers, W. K., & Powers, M. N. (1986). Putting on the dog. Natural History, 2, 6–16.
  20. Savolainen, P., Zhang, Y., Luo, J., Lundeberg, J., & Leitner, T. (2002). Genetic evidence for an East Asian origin of domestic dogs. Science, 298, 1610–1613. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Sawada, J., Nguyen Kim, T., & Nguyen, A. T. (2011). Faunal remains at Man Bac. In M. F. Oxenham, H. Matsumura, & D. Nguyen Kim (Eds.), Man Bac: The excavation of a Neolithic site in Northern Vietnam (pp. 105–116). Canberra: Australian National University E Press.
  22. Schwabe, C. W. (1979). Unmentionable cuisine. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.
  23. Serpell, J. (1995). From paragon to pariah: Some reflections on human attitudes to dogs. In J. Serpell (Ed.), The domestic dog: Its evolution, behaviour and interactions with people (pp. 245–256). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  24. Serpell, J. (1996). In the company of animals: A study of human–animal relationships. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  25. Simoons, F. J. (1994). Eat not this flesh: Food avoidances from prehistory to the present (2nd ed.). Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.
  26. The Vietnam Investment Review. (1999, February 8). Catching rats in the Year of the Cat. The Vietnam Investment Review. Retrieved from http://www.terrierman.com/vitenam.htm
  27. Trong Phung, V. (2006). The industry of marrying Europeans (Thuy Tranviet, Trans.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  28. Walraven, B. (2001). Bardo soup and Confucians’ meat: Food and Korean identity in global context. In K. Cwiertka & B. Walraven (Eds.), Asian food: The global and the local (pp. 95–115). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
  29. Wertheim, H. F. L., Nguyen, T. Q., Nguyen, K. A. T., DeJong, M. D., Taylor, W. R. J., Le, T. V., et al. (2009). Furious rabies after an atypical exposure. PLoS Medicine, 6(3), e1000044. doi: 10.137/journal.pmed.1000044 .
  30. Westgarth, C., Pinchbeck, G. L., Bradshaw, J. W. S., Dawson, S., Gaskell, R. M., & Christley, R. M. (2007). Factors associated with dog ownership and contact with dogs in a UK community. BMC Veterinary Research, 3, 5. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-3-5 . · DOI
  31. Wu, F. H. (2002). The best “chink” food. Dog eating and the dilemma of diversity. Gastronomica, 2, 38–45. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Podberscek, A. L.
Venue
Companion Animals in Everyday Life
Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan US
Published
2016
Pages
111-127
DOI
10.1057/978-1-137-59572-0_8
Cited by
4
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review