Cited by 960Human-Animal Interaction StudiesGenetic diversity and population structureForensic and Genetic Research

Genetic Evidence for an East Asian Origin of Domestic Dogs

Savolainen, Peter, Zhang, Ya-ping, Luo, Jing, Lundeberg, Joakim, Leitner, Thomas·2002·Science

Abstract

The origin of the domestic dog from wolves has been established, but the number of founding events, as well as where and when these occurred, is not known. To address these questions, we examined the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequence variation among 654 domestic dogs representing all major dog populations worldwide. Although our data indicate several maternal origins from wolf, >95% of all sequences belonged to three phylogenetic groups universally represented at similar frequencies, suggesting a common origin from a single gene pool for all dog populations. A larger genetic variation in East Asia than in other regions and the pattern of phylogeographic variation suggest an East Asian origin for the domestic dog, ∼15,000 years ago.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1073906

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Since 2002, the locus for the domestic dog has been changing with each new genetic study, from East Asia to eastern Africa to the Middle East and back to East Asia, but since 2012, southern (greater) China has become the likelier locus.

    “Since 2002, the locus for the domestic dog has been changing with each new genetic study, from East Asia (Savolainen et al. 2002) to eastern Africa (Boyko et al. 2009) to the Middle East (VonHoldt et al. 2010) and back to East Asia (Pang et al. 2009), but since 2012, southern (greater) China has become the likelier locus (Ding et al. 2012).”

    From The Dog-Eared Dictionary: Human-Animal Alliance in Chinese Civilization (2015) · cites this paper as Savolainen et al. 2002

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Savolainen, P., Zhang, Y.-P., Luo, J., Lundeberg, J., & Leitner, T.
Affiliations
  • KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
  • Kunming Institute of Zoology (CN)
  • Swedish Institute (SE)
Corresponding author
  • Savolainen, Peter
  • Luo, Jing
Venue
Science
Published
2002-11-22
Volume
298
Issue
5598
Pages
1610-1613
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2081901919
Cited by
960
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 66
FWCI
18.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
Keywords
dog domestication, mitochondrial DNA, phylogeography, maternal lineage, East Asian origin, genetic variation, dog population, founder events
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Domestic, Archaeology, Asia, DNA, Mitochondrial, Dogs, Female, Gene Pool, Genes, Haplotypes, Molecular Sequence Data, Phylogeny, Time, Genetic Variation, Wolves

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review