Cited by 493Political Science Research and EducationSocial Science and Policy ResearchQualitative Comparative Analysis Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Theory and Methods in Political Science

Lowndes, Vivien, David D. Marsh, Gerry Stoker·2018

Abstract

Now with substantial extra coverage of methodological issues and an additional chapter on the philosophy of politics, this widely-used text introduces students to the approaches and methods of political science

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/978-1-137-60353-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Lowndes, V., Marsh, D. D., & Stoker, G.
Published
2018
OpenAlex
W1713130930
Cited by
493
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 6
FWCI
21.38
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Science Research and Education
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Social Science and Policy Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Keywords
political science methodology, political philosophy, political theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review