Cited by 95Global Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyPublic Health Policies and EducationSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Changing Policy Framing as a Deliberate Strategy for Public Health Advocacy: A Qualitative Policy Case Study of Minimum Unit Pricing of Alcohol

Open access
KATIKIREDDI, SRINIVASA VITTAL, BOND, LYNDAL, HILTON, SHONA·2014·The Milbank Quarterly

Abstract

Context: Scotland is the first country in the world to pass legislation introducing a minimum unit price (MUP) for alcohol in an attempt to reduce consumption and associated harms by increasing the price of the cheapest alcohol. We investigated the competing ways in which policy stakeholders presented the debate. We then established whether a change in framing helped explain the policy's emergence. Methods: We conducted a detailed policy case study through analysis of evidence submitted to the Scottish parliament, and in‐depth, one‐to‐one interviews ( n = 36) with politicians, civil servants, advocates, researchers, and industry representatives. Findings: Public‐ and voluntary‐sector stakeholders tended to support MUP, while industry representatives were more divided. Two markedly different ways of presenting alcohol as a policy problem were evident. Critics of MUP (all of whom were related to industry) emphasized social disorder issues, particularly among young people, and hence argued for targeted approaches. In contrast, advocates for MUP (with the exception of those in industry) focused on alcohol as a health issue arising from overconsumption at a population level, thus suggesting that population‐based interventions were necessary. Industry stakeholders favoring MUP adopted a hybrid framing, maintaining several aspects of the critical framing. Our interview data showed that public health advocates worked hard to redefine the policy issue by deliberately presenting a consistent alternative framing. Conclusions: Framing alcohol policy as a broad, multisectoral, public health issue that requires a whole‐population approach has been crucial to enabling policymakers to seriously consider MUP, and public health advocates intentionally presented alcohol policy in this way. This reframing helped prioritize public health considerations in the policy debate and represents a deliberate strategy for consideration by those advocating for policy change around the world and in other public health areas.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1468-0009.12057

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Qualitative research undertaken in preparation for, or alongside, natural experimental studies can help to identify which outcomes might change as a consequence of the intervention and which are priorities for decision makers.

    “Qualitative research undertaken in preparation for, or alongside, NE studies can help to identify which outcomes might change as a consequence of the intervention and which are priorities for decision makers (42).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 74 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [30]Riker WH The Art of Political Manipulation 1986 New Haven, CT Yale University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
KATIKIREDDI, S. V., BOND, L., & HILTON, S.
Affiliations
  • NHS Lothian (GB)
  • MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit (GB)
Corresponding author
KATIKIREDDI, SRINIVASA VITTAL
Venue
The Milbank Quarterly
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-06
Volume
92
Issue
2
Pages
250-283
ISSN
  • 0887-378X (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-0009
OpenAlex
W2148516002
Cited by
95
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4
FWCI
21.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Milbank Quarterly (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (acceptedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Chief Scientist Office (MC_U130059812 and MC_UU_12017/4)
  • Medical Research Council (MC_U130085862 and MC_UU_12017/6)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
minimum unit pricing, alcohol policy, policy framing, public health advocacy, alcohol consumption, alcohol industry, policy stakeholders, population-level interventions, Scotland, alcohol harm, social disorder
MeSH terms
Administrative Personnel, Alcoholic Beverages, Costs and Cost Analysis, Health Policy, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Legislation as Topic, Scotland, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review