Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 290

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Scenario Planning - Revised and Updated Edition

Open access
Lindgren, Mats, Bandhold, Hans·2009

Abstract

List of Figures List of Tables Foreword Introduction Why is Scenario Planning Needed?: Some Reasons from the field of Strategy Research Scenario Planning: An Introductory Overview Scenario Planning in Practice The Principles of Scenario Thinking The Principles of Strategic Thinking Appendix I Appendix II Notes Kairos Future References Further Reading Index

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/9780230233584

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 60 references

Cited by

See all 290

Metadata

Authors
Lindgren, M., & Bandhold, H.
Published
2009-03-31
OpenAlex
W1643259229
Cited by
290
References
60
FWCI
32.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scenario Planning - Revised and Updated Edition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1057/9780230233584
The paper
Lindgren, M., & Bandhold, H. (2009). Scenario Planning - Revised and Updated Edition. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230233584

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.