Cited by 3,503Accounting and Organizational ManagementManagement and Organizational PracticesOrganizational Strategy and Culture

Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches

Open access
Venkatraman, N., Ramanujam, Vasudevan·1986·The Academy of Management Review

Abstract

Made available in DSpace on 2012-01-25T22:32:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 onmeasurementofb1135venk.pdf: 1912897 bytes, checksum: 42e6d38d10d29fd36d61de6a2c13e1c1 (MD5) license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) Previous issue date:

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/258398

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bagozzi, P. R. (1980). Casual models in marketing . NY: Wiley.
  2. Campbell, J. P. (1977). On the nature of organizational effectiveness. In Goodman, P. S. , Pennings, J. M. , and Associates (Eds.). New perspectives on organizational effectiveness . San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass .
  3. Dess, G. G. , & Robinson, R. B. (1984). Measuring organizational per- formance in the absence of objective measures: The case of privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strategic Management Journal , 5, 265-273.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
Venue
The Academy of Management Review
Published
1986-10
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
801
ISSN
0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043448735
Cited by
3,503
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 115 · 2025: 91 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 115 · 2022: 100 · 2021: 114 · 2020: 127 · 2019: 148 · 2018: 157 · 2017: 136 · 2016: 162 · 2015: 180 · 2014: 211 · 2013: 216 · 2012: 181
FWCI
11.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
  • Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Accounting and Organizational Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Organizational Practices
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Strategy and Culture
Keywords
enterprise performance evaluation, organizational performance, organizational effectiveness, performance evaluation, levels of analysis, strategic management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review