The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Expert Interview and Changes in Knowledge Production
Abstract
The expert interview as a method of qualitative empirical research, designed to explore expert knowledge, has been developed considerably since the early 1990s. A number of readers has been published 1 and thus a gap in the methods’ literature has been dealt with, much to the benefit of many disciplines and fields of research in the social sciences. It can be assumed that through increased reflection on methodical issues research into experts’ knowledge has gained in professionalism and quality. 2 These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty
Linder, F., Spear, J., Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2003) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/3089636 · Cited by 3,381
Schutz, A. (1964) · Phaenomenologica · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-6854-2 · Cited by 747
The well-informed citizen; an essay on the social distribution of knowledge.
Schütz, A. (1946) · PubMed · Cited by 223
Cited by
The rise of artificial intelligence – understanding the AI identity threat at the workplace
Mirbabaie, M., Brünker, F., Möllmann Frick, N. R. J., & Stieglitz, S. (2022) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-021-00496-x · Cited by 362
Whose voices? Whose knowledge? A feminist analysis of the value of key informant interviews
Lokot, M. (2021) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/1609406920948775 · Cited by 154
Digital transformation and the public sector auditing: The SAI’s perspective
Otia, J. E., & Bracci, E. (2022) · Financial Accountability & Management · doi:10.1111/faam.12317 · Cited by 124
Su, J., & Yang, W. (2024) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12867 · Cited by 116
Giannoumis, G. A. (2015) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v20i9.6167 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Meuser, M., & Nagel, U.
- Venue
- Interviewing Experts
- Publisher
- Palgrave Macmillan UK
- Published
- 2009
- Pages
- 17-42
- OpenAlex
- W2460474575
- Cited by
- 508
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.26
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Expert Interview and Changes in Knowledge Production. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1057/9780230244276_2
- The paper
- Meuser, M., & Nagel, U. (2009). The Expert Interview and Changes in Knowledge Production. Interviewing Experts. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230244276_2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
