The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Discourse-Knowledge Interface
Abstract
One of the major challenges of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is to make explicit the relations between discourse and knowledge. Both discourse and knowledge are very complex phenomena studied in virtually all disciplines of the humanities and social sciences. Thus, we may expect that also a theory of their relationships has philosophical, linguistic, psychological, sociological and anthropological dimensions. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Language becomes a way in which people make sense of their social surroundings.”
From The memeification of "woke culture": a multimodal critical discourse analysis of its articulation in Essence; O, The Oprah Magazine; and Teen Vogue (2023) · cites this paper as van Dijk, 2003
In the citing paper
“The process of how people combine text and symbols can be shaped by their own experiences with educational systems, institutions at the federal, local and state levels, religious beliefs and practices, and cultural and ethnic backgrounds.”
From The memeification of "woke culture": a multimodal critical discourse analysis of its articulation in Essence; O, The Oprah Magazine; and Teen Vogue (2023) · cites this paper as van Dijk, 2003
In the citing paper
“The language used can signal member groups' interests and ideologies.”
From The memeification of "woke culture": a multimodal critical discourse analysis of its articulation in Essence; O, The Oprah Magazine; and Teen Vogue (2023) · cites this paper as van Dijk, 2003
Citations
Cites
Lakoff, G. P., & Johnson, M. L. (2003) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001 · Cited by 25,466
Corsaro, W. A., & Bourdieu, P. (1992) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2579985 · Cited by 9,968
Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought
VEREZA, S. C. (1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-0239 · Cited by 9,849
Ryle, G. (2006) · Rowman & Littlefield Publishers eBooks · doi:10.5040/9798216413257.ch-2 · Cited by 6,804
Relevance: Communication and Cognition
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986) · Cited by 6,708
(1972) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 5,727
Foundations of Cognitive Grammar
Winters, M. E., & Langacker, R. W. (1988) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/327796 · Cited by 5,666
Strategies of Discourse Comprehension
Staczek, J. J., van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1985) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/326517 · Cited by 5,377
Clark, H. H. (1996) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511620539 · Cited by 5,123
Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis
van Dijk, T. A. (1993) · Discourse & Society · doi:10.1177/0957926593004002006 · Cited by 5,077
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Dijkstra, T. and Smedt, K. (eds) (1996) Computational Psycholinguistics. AI and Connectionist Models of Human Language Processing. London: Taylor & Francis.
- Farr, R.M. and Moscovici, S. (eds) (1984) Social Representations. Cambridge; New York/Paris: Cambridge University Press/Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.
- Fiske, S.T. and Taylor, S.E. (1991) Social Cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Gumperz, J.J. and Levinson, S.C. (eds) (1996) Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1983) Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference and Consciousness. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
- van Oostendorp, H. and Goldman, S.R. (eds) (1999) The Construction of Mental Presentations during Reading. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Popularization Discourse and Knowledge about the Genome
Calsamiglia, H., & van Dijk, T. A. (2004) · Discourse & Society · doi:10.1177/0957926504043705 · Cited by 247
Mediation between discourse and society: assessing cognitive approaches in CDA
Wodak, R. (2006) · Discourse Studies · doi:10.1177/1461445606059566 · Cited by 216
Wodak, R., & Busch, B. (2004) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412976077.n6 · Cited by 136
Loss of organizational knowledge
Treleaven, L., & Sykes, C. (2005) · Journal of Organizational Change Management · doi:10.1108/09534810510607056 · Cited by 120
How to analyse collective identity in discourse : Textual and contextual parameters
Koller, V. (2012) · Critical approaches to discourse analysis across disciplines · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- van Dijk, T. A.
- Corresponding author
- van Dijk, Teun A.
- ORCID
- van Dijk, Teun A.
- Venue
- Critical Discourse Analysis
- Publisher
- Palgrave Macmillan UK
- Published
- 2003
- Pages
- 85-109
- OpenAlex
- W2398544988
- Cited by
- 142
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 60.54
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Cultural and political discourse analysis
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
- Keywords
- critical discourse analysis, epistemology, philosophy of language, sociology of knowledge
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
