Surveillance, Power and Everyday Life
Abstract
Surveillance grows constantly, especially in the countries of the global north. Although as a set of practices it is as old as history itself, systematic surveil-lance became a routine and inescapable part of everyday life in modern times and is now, more often than not, dependent on information and communication technologies (ICTs). Indeed, it now makes some sense to talk of “surveillance societies,” so pervasive is organizational monitoring of many kinds. Fast developing technologies combined with new governmental and commercial strategies have led to the proliferation of new modes of surveillance, making surveillance expansion hard to follow, let alone analyze or regulate. In the past three decades traffic in personal data has expanded explosively, touching numerous points of everyday life and leading some to proclaim the “end of privacy.” But although questions of privacy are interesting and important, others that relate to the ways in which data are used for “social sorting,” discriminating between groups that are classified differently, also need urgently to be examined. Who has the power to make such discriminatory judgments, and how this becomes embedded in automated systems, is a matter of public interest. Such questions are likely to be with us for some time, because of what might be called the “rise of the safety state,” which requires more and more surveillance, and also because the politics of personal information is becoming increasingly prominent. These keyword…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Private contractors and consultants purposefully exploited an environment of fear to sell technology with little consideration of their products' potential consequences.
“While the country's security architecture undoubtedly needed an update, scholars have argued that private contractors and consultants purposefully exploited an environment of fear to sell technology with little consideration of their products' potential consequences.”
From Mapping Interfacial Regimes of Control: A Qualitative Analysis of America’s Post-9/11 Security Technology Infrastructure (2020) · cites this paper as Lyon 2010
Networked technologies have aided security and border officials by allowing them to mine external databases and develop complex data representations of individuals.
“In this sense, networked technologies have aided security and border officials by allowing them to mine external databases and develop complex data representations of individuals (Lyon 2010: 23; Amoore 2006).”
From Mapping Interfacial Regimes of Control: A Qualitative Analysis of America’s Post-9/11 Security Technology Infrastructure (2020) · cites this paper as Lyon 2010
Securitization efforts facilitated by the rapid adoption of private industry technology after 9/11 demonstrate a distinct shift in strategy in which surveillance technology infrastructures create a means of social sorting and anticipate and mitigate security threats.
“Furthermore, securitization efforts facilitated by the rapid adoption of private industry technology after 9/11 demonstrate a distinct shift in strategy in which surveillance technology infrastructures create a means of 'social sorting' and, in turn, anticipate and mitigate security threats (Lyon 2010: 22).”
From Mapping Interfacial Regimes of Control: A Qualitative Analysis of America’s Post-9/11 Security Technology Infrastructure (2020) · cites this paper as Lyon 2010
Cites
Haggerty, K. D., & Ericson, R. V. (2000) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1080/00071310020015280 · Cited by 2,244 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
M-health and health promotion: The digital cyborg and surveillance society
Lupton, D. (2012) · Social Theory & Health · doi:10.1057/sth.2012.6 · Cited by 411 · see citing works
Knight, E., & Gekker, A. (2020) · Surveillance & Society · doi:10.24908/ss.v18i2.13268 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lyon, D.
- Affiliations
- Queen's University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Lyon, David
- ORCID
- Lyon, David
- Venue
- Emerging Digital Spaces in Contemporary Society
- Publisher
- Palgrave Macmillan UK
- Published
- 2010
- Pages
- 107-120
- OpenAlex
- W2418647603
- Cited by
- 125
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 24.37
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Communication › Cultural Studies and Postmodernism
- Keywords
- surveillance, surveillance society, information and communication technologies, privacy, personal data, social sorting, discrimination, automated decision-making, power, everyday life
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review