Cited by 125Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionEthics and Social Impacts of AICultural Studies and Postmodernism

Surveillance, Power and Everyday Life

Lyon, David·2010·Emerging Digital Spaces in Contemporary Society

Abstract

Surveillance grows constantly, especially in the countries of the global north. Although as a set of practices it is as old as history itself, systematic surveil-lance became a routine and inescapable part of everyday life in modern times and is now, more often than not, dependent on information and communication technologies (ICTs). Indeed, it now makes some sense to talk of “surveillance societies,” so pervasive is organizational monitoring of many kinds. Fast developing technologies combined with new governmental and commercial strategies have led to the proliferation of new modes of surveillance, making surveillance expansion hard to follow, let alone analyze or regulate. In the past three decades traffic in personal data has expanded explosively, touching numerous points of everyday life and leading some to proclaim the “end of privacy.” But although questions of privacy are interesting and important, others that relate to the ways in which data are used for “social sorting,” discriminating between groups that are classified differently, also need urgently to be examined. Who has the power to make such discriminatory judgments, and how this becomes embedded in automated systems, is a matter of public interest. Such questions are likely to be with us for some time, because of what might be called the “rise of the safety state,” which requires more and more surveillance, and also because the politics of personal information is becoming increasingly prominent. These keyword…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/9780230299047_18

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Private contractors and consultants purposefully exploited an environment of fear to sell technology with little consideration of their products' potential consequences.

    “While the country's security architecture undoubtedly needed an update, scholars have argued that private contractors and consultants purposefully exploited an environment of fear to sell technology with little consideration of their products' potential consequences.”
  • Networked technologies have aided security and border officials by allowing them to mine external databases and develop complex data representations of individuals.

    “In this sense, networked technologies have aided security and border officials by allowing them to mine external databases and develop complex data representations of individuals (Lyon 2010: 23; Amoore 2006).”
  • Securitization efforts facilitated by the rapid adoption of private industry technology after 9/11 demonstrate a distinct shift in strategy in which surveillance technology infrastructures create a means of social sorting and anticipate and mitigate security threats.

    “Furthermore, securitization efforts facilitated by the rapid adoption of private industry technology after 9/11 demonstrate a distinct shift in strategy in which surveillance technology infrastructures create a means of 'social sorting' and, in turn, anticipate and mitigate security threats (Lyon 2010: 22).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Lyon, D.
Affiliations
Queen's University (CA)
Corresponding author
Lyon, David
Venue
Emerging Digital Spaces in Contemporary Society
Published
2010
Pages
107-120
OpenAlex
W2418647603
Cited by
125
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
24.37
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Cultural Studies and Postmodernism
Keywords
surveillance, surveillance society, information and communication technologies, privacy, personal data, social sorting, discrimination, automated decision-making, power, everyday life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review