Cited by 411Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsInnovative Human-Technology InteractionCOVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing

M-health and health promotion: The digital cyborg and surveillance society

Open access
Lupton, Deborah·2012·Social Theory & Health

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/sth.2012.6

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The patient is unlikely and unable to be made aware of the categorisations and interpretations of the data that frame his treatment, yet she will be treated by medical professionals and institutions on the basis of this identity that has been constructed beyond her control or awareness.

    “The patient is unlikely and unable to be made aware of the categorisations and interpretations of the data that frame his treatment (Monahan and Wall 2007;Lupton 2012;Mittelstadt and Floridi 2016), yet she will be treated by medical professionals and institutions on the basis of this identity that has been constructed beyond her control or awareness.”

    From Ethics of the health-related internet of things: a narrative review (2017) · cites this paper as Lupton 2012

  • Critical discussions of self-tracking for health have emerged in the social sciences literature, giving rise to a broad, polarized debate.

    “In response to the overwhelmingly positive attention that self-tracking has received in the medical and public health literature, critical discussions of self-tracking for health have begun to emerge in the social sciences literature (e.g., Lupton 2012Lupton , 2013Lupton , 2014Lupton , 2015;;Morozov 2013;Whitson 2013;Nafus and Sherman 2014;Ruckenstein 2014;Till 2014), giving rise to a broad, Polar”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lupton, D.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Lupton, Deborah
Venue
Social Theory & Health
Published
2012-06-27
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
229-244
ISSN
  • 1477-8211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-822X
OpenAlex
W2095298352
Cited by
411
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 9
FWCI
33.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Theory & Health (publishedVersion)
  • The Sydney eScholarship Repository (The University of Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing
Keywords
mobile health, health promotion, surveillance society, embodiment, selfhood, interpersonal relationships, Web 2.0, mobile technology, social media, health monitoring, persuasive technology, responsible citizenship, healthy behaviours, body and technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review