Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 345

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 100 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Online Communication in Language Learning and Teaching

Lamy, Marie-Noëlle, Hampel, Regine·2007·Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks
DOI 10.1057/9780230592681
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This offers a framework for thinking about technologies that allow online communication, for example, forums, chats, real-time platforms as well as virtual worlds and mobile devices, and the practical

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/9780230592681

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 100 references

Cited by

See all 345

Metadata

Authors
Lamy, M.-N., & Hampel, R.
Venue
Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks
Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan UK
Published
2007
DOI
10.1057/9780230592681
OpenAlex
W1500012914
Cited by
345
References
100
FWCI
16.10
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Online Communication in Language Learning and Teaching. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1057/9780230592681
The paper
Lamy, M.-N., & Hampel, R. (2007). Online Communication in Language Learning and Teaching. Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592681

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.