Cited by 1Political Economy and MarxismGlobalization and political ideologiesSocial Policy and Reform Studies

Kicking Away the Ladder

Ha-Joon, Chang·2013·Developmental Politics in Transition

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/9781137028303.0010

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These treaties lasted well into the 20th century for some countries.

    “These treaties lasted well into the 20th century for some countries.”

    From Industrial Policy in the 21st Century (2020) · cites this paper as Chang, 2002: 51-53

  • Unequal treaties introduced the most favoured nation concept, enabling stronger countries to bully weaker ones collectively.

    “These treaties also introduced the concept of 'most favoured nation', which enabled all the countries that signed an (unequal) treaty with a weaker country to get a more favourable treatment, if one of them manages to extract it, thus allowing the stronger countries to bully the weaker ones collectively.”

    From Industrial Policy in the 21st Century (2020) · cites this paper as Chang, 2002: 51-53

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ha-Joon, C.
Corresponding author
Ha-Joon, Chang
Venue
Developmental Politics in Transition
Published
2013-08-16
OpenAlex
W4230039907
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Palgrave Macmillan eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Economy and Marxism
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Globalization and political ideologies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review