The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Ends of Philosophy of Religion
Abstract
Knepper criticizes existing efforts in the philosophy of religion for being out of step with, and therefore useless to, the academic study of religion, then forwards a new program for philosophy of re
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A concise and responsible account of an idea, then, requires what Burley ( ) and Knepper ( ) have called ' thick description ' , speci fi cally at the philosophical level: one must clarify the context as fully as possible.”
From ‘The view from above’: a theory of comparative philosophy (2020) · cites this paper as Knepper (2013)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
‘The view from above’: a theory of comparative philosophy
FRAZIER, J. (2020) · Religious Studies · doi:10.1017/s0034412519000362 · Cited by 11
How to philosophize about religion globally and critically . . . with undergraduates
KNEPPER, T. D. (2020) · Religious Studies · doi:10.1017/s0034412519000441 · Cited by 1
Self-citationBURLEY, M. (2020) · Religious Studies · doi:10.1017/s0034412519000659 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Knepper, T. D.
- Corresponding author
- Knepper, Timothy D.
- ORCID
- Knepper, Timothy D.
- Venue
- Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks
- Publisher
- Palgrave Macmillan US
- Published
- 2013
- OpenAlex
- W2497241180
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4
- FWCI
- 1.82
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Karl Barth and Christian Theology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Keywords
- philosophy of religion, religious studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Ends of Philosophy of Religion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1057/9781137324412
- The paper
- Knepper, T. D. (2013). The Ends of Philosophy of Religion. Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137324412
