Cited by 39Education and Critical Thinking DevelopmentCritical and Liberation PedagogyEducational Strategies and Epistemologies

Critical Thinking through a Multicultural Lens: Cultural Challenges of Teaching Critical Thinking

Bali, Maha·2015·The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education

Abstract

When I first started doing research about critical thinking (CT), I had not realized how contested a notion (Atkinson 1997) it was, even though it is widely accepted as an important goal of (at least Western) higher education (Barnett 1997; Norris 1995). Most people agree that critical thinking is essential for citizens to participate actively in a democracy (Brookfield 1987; Johnson and Morris 2010; ten Dam and Volman 2004). There is also a need for citizens to criticize the systems and hierarchies in which they live, whether academic or corporate, whether in a democratic state or not, questioning and challenging even the structures within which we conduct critical thinking. Some scholars claim that critical thinking is culturally biased (e.g., Atkinson 1997; Fox 1994; Norris 1995), which is a view I initially dismissed, because the ideas and practices of CT exist in my own Egyptian Islamic culture. Some scholars argue that viewing critical thinking as distant from non-Anglo (i.e., non-English speaking) cultures is a symptom of misunderstandings (Ennis 1998), and even ignorance of, and condescension toward non-Westerners’ capacities for rational thinking (Nussbaum 1997). Claims of cultural distance or difference are often presented under the guise of cultural sensitivity, while hiding reductionist and deficit-oriented tendencies (Zamel 1997). These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learn…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/9781137378057_20

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Bali, M.
Corresponding author
Bali, Maha
Venue
The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education
Published
2015
Pages
317-334
OpenAlex
W2286187785
Cited by
39
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.80
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Palgrave Macmillan eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Critical and Liberation Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Keywords
critical thinking, multicultural education, deficit thinking, cultural sensitivity, non-Western cultures, higher education, democratic citizenship, rational thinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review