CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 5,664Income, Poverty, and InequalityPolitical Philosophy and EthicsHuman Rights and Development

Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach

Nussbaum, Martha C.·2011·Harvard University Press eBooks
DOI 10.4159/harvard.9780674061200
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

If a country’s Gross Domestic Product increases each year, but so does the percentage of its people deprived of basic education, health care, and other opportunities, is that country really making progress? If we rely on conventional economic indicators, can we ever grasp how the world’s billions of individuals are really managing? In this powerful critique, Martha Nussbaum argues that our dominant theories of development have given us policies that ignore our most basic human needs for dignity and self-respect. For the past twenty-five years, Nussbaum has been working on an alternate model to assess human development: the Capabilities Approach. She and her colleagues begin with the simplest of questions: What is each person actually able to do and to be? What real opportunities are available to them? The Capabilities Approach to human progress has until now been expounded only in specialized works. Creating Capabilities , however, affords anyone interested in issues of human development a wonderfully lucid account of the structure and practical implications of an alternate model. It demonstrates a path to justice for both humans and nonhumans, weighs its relevance against other philosophical stances, and reveals the value of its universal guidelines even as it acknowledges cultural difference. In our era of unjustifiable inequity, Nussbaum shows how—by attending to the narratives of individuals and grasping the daily impact of policy—we can enable people everywhere to live full and creative lives.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4159/harvard.9780674061200

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Perspectives such as Occupational Justice and the Capabilities Framework ground an understanding of what people can do and be in the structural and contextual conditions that support or restrict possibilities for doing, and thereby could locate time use scholarship and practice in the realm of social justice.

    “For example, perspectives such as Occupational Justice (90) and the Capabilities Framework (91, 92) ground an understanding of what people can do and be in the structural and contextual conditions that support or restrict possibilities for doing, and thereby could locate time use scholarship and practice in the realm of social justice.”

    From Contributions of a time use perspective in community mental health practice: a scoping review (2024) · cites this paper as [92]

  • Swaraj's leadership expanded substantive freedoms and opportunities for women in political life and beyond.

    “Sen's (1999) and Nussbaum's (2011) capability approach provides a normative framework for evaluating how Swaraj's leadership expanded substantive freedoms and opportunities for women in political life and beyond.”

    From Transcending Boundaries: Sushma Swaraj and the Multidimensional Paradigm of Women's Empowerment in Political Leadership (2025) · cites this paper as Nussbaum's (2011)

  • Social justice requires equal rights through equitable access to resources and opportunities, especially for people living in poverty or with disability, or who are marginalized.

    “Social justice requires equal rights through equitable access to resources and opportunities, especially for people living in poverty or with disability, or who are marginalized in various ways 41,42 .”

    From Ethical challenges in contemporary psychiatry: an overview and an appraisal of possible strategies and research needs (2024) · cites this paper as [42]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Nussbaum, M. C.
Corresponding author
Nussbaum, Martha C.
Venue
Harvard University Press eBooks
Publisher
Harvard University Press
Published
2011-12-31
DOI
10.4159/harvard.9780674061200
OpenAlex
W4240580964
Cited by
5,664
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 851 · 2025: 597 · 2024: 405 · 2023: 466 · 2022: 391 · 2021: 451 · 2020: 404 · 2019: 434 · 2018: 319 · 2017: 270 · 2016: 236 · 2015: 159 · 2014: 452 · 2013: 135 · 2012: 74
FWCI
269.84
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Harvard University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Human Rights and Development
Keywords
capability approach, human development, basic needs, human dignity, self-respect, development theory, economic indicators, justice, non-human animals, cultural differences, personal narrative, inequality, Martha Nussbaum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review