Cited by 17Culinary Culture and TourismFood, Nutrition, and Cultural PracticesCultural Identity and Heritage

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Remaking of a National Cuisine: The Food Education Campaign in Japan

Assmann, Stephanie·2015·The Globalization of Asian Cuisines

Abstract

On December 5, 2013, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) acknowledged washoku , which can be translated as “Japanese cuisine,” as an intangible cultural world heritage. In particular Japan’s elaborate New Year’s cuisine ( o-sechi ryōri ) received the status of a cultural world heritage. In accordance with the Japanese government’s efforts to convey the image of a globally recognized national cuisine characterized by elegance and tradition, washoku has joined the list of intangible cultural world heritage assets next to the French gastronomic meal, Mexican cuisine, and a number of specific culinary dishes such as Korean pickles (kimchi) and gingerbread from Northern Croatia (Robinson 2014). One intent of applying for world heritage status for washoku was to shift global attention away from the potential dangers associated with radiation and food safety after the nuclear disaster of March 11, 2011, and elevate the image of Japanese cuisine by associating it with elaborate cuisine, refined ingredients, and cleanliness. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/9781137514080_9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Barlösisus, Eva. 2011. Soziologie des Essens. Eine sozial- und kulturwissenschaftliche Einführung in die Ernährungsforschung (Sociology of Food: A Social and Cultural Introduction to Nutrition Research].Weinheim und München: Juventa.
  2. Center for the Advancement of Food Education by the Cabinet Offce (Nai-kaku-fu Shokuiku suishin shitsu). 2013. “Current Situation and Tasks of Policies for Advancing Food Education” (Shokuiku suishin shisaku no genjō to kadai). In Food Education White Book (Shokuiku hakusho). Accessed January 29, 2015. http://www8.cao.go.jp /syokuiku/data/whitepaper/ 2013/pdf/gaiyo1sho1.pdf.
  3. Cwiertka, Katarzyna Joanna. 2006. Modern Japanese Cuisine: Food, Power, and National Identity. London: Reaktion Books.
  4. Distribution System Research Center. 2012. Shokuseikatsu oyobi nōrin gyōgyō taiken ni kansuru chōsa (Survey on Food Life and Experiences of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries). Accessed April 13, 2014. http://www.maff.go.jp /j/syokuiku/pdf/23_syokuiku_itaku_cyousa_kekka.pdf.
  5. Foucault, Michel. 1976. Überwachen und Strafen. Die Geburt des Gefängnisses (Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
  6. Hope, Andrew. 2013. “Foucault, Panopticism and School Surveillance Research.” In Social Theory and Education Research Understanding Foucault, Habermas, Bourdieu and Derrida, edited by Mark Murphy, 35–51. London: Routledge.
  7. Japan Finance Corporation (Nihon seisaku kinyū kinko kokumin seikatsu jigyō honbu seikatsu eisei yūshi-bu). 2013. Gaishoku ni kansuru shōhisha ishiki to inshokuten no keiei jittai chōsa (Survey on consumer awareness regarding eating out and restaurants). Last modifed December 18, 2013. Accessed December 3, 2014. https://www.jfc.go.jp /n/fndings/pdf/seikatsu25_1218a.pdf.
  8. Kimura, Hirata Aya. 2011. “Nationalism, Patriarchy, and Moralism: The Government-Led Food Reform in Contemporary Japan.” Food and Food-ways: Explorations in the History and Culture of Human Nourishment, 19: 3, 201–27. · DOI
  9. Klotter, Christoph. 2013. “Gesundheitszwänge im Lichte der Theorie Foucaults” (Health Obsessions in Light of Foucault’s Theory). In Gesundheitszwänge (Health Obsessions), edited by Hans-Wolfgang Hoefert and Christoph Klotter, 7–39. Lengerich: Pabst.
  10. Kroke, Anja. 2013. “Der perfekte Body Mass Index” (The Perfect Body Mass Index). In Gesundheitszwänge (Health Obsessions), edited by Hans-Wolfgang Hoefert and Christoph Klotter, 110–30. Lengerich: Pabst.
  11. Kuczmarski Robert J. and Katherine M. Flegal. 2000. “Criteria for Defnition of Overweight in Transition: Background and Recommendations for the United States.” American Society for Clinical Nutrition: 1074–81. Accessed April 15, 2015. http://ajcn.nutrition.org /content/72/5/1074.full. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Mae, Michiko. 2008. “Zur Entwicklung einer partizipatorischen Zivilgesellschaft in Japan” (About the Development of a Participatory Civil Society in Japan). In Japan 2008. Politik, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft (Japan 2008: Politics, Economy, and Society), edited by Iris Wieczorek, 217–40. Berlin: Vereinigung für Sozialwissenschaftliche Japanforschung.
  13. McVeigh, Brian. 2001. “Postwar Japan’s ‘Hard’ and ‘Soft’ Nationalism.” Japan Policy Research Institute (JPRI) at the University of San Francisco Center for the Pacifc Rim, Working Paper No. 73.
  14. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW). 2012. Heisei 24 Nen Kokumin kenkō eiyō chōsa kekka no gaiyō (Overview of the Results of the Survey of Health and Nutrition of the Japanese Population for the Year 2012]. Accessed April 8, 2015. http://www.mhlw.go.jp /fle/04-Houdouhappyou-10904750-Kenkoukyoku-Gantaisakukenkou-zoushinka/0000032813.pdf.
  15. Müller, Claudia, Maike Groeneveld, and Margret Büning-Fesel. 2007. “Food Literacy—Essen als Querschnittsthema der Erwachsenenbildung” (Food Literacy—Food as a General Topic in Adult Learning]. Ernährung im Fokus (Nutrition in Focus] 7: 5–7.
  16. Prime Minister’s Cabinet Offce. 2015. About ‘Awareness Survey Regarding Food and Nutrition Education’ (‘Shokuiku ni kansuru ishiki chōsa’ ni tsuite). Accessed April 8, 2015. http://www8.cao.go.jp /syokuiku/more/research/syokuiku.html.
  17. Sternsdorff Cisterna, Nicolas. 2014. “On Food and Safety: What is the Meaning of Safety in Post-Fukushima Japan?” In To See Once More the Stars. Living in a Post-Fukushima World, edited by Daisuke Naito, Ryan Syre, Heather Swanson, and Satsuki Takahashi, Santa Cruz: New Pacifc Press, pp. 74–75.
  18. Suematsu, Hiroyuki. 2008. Shokuryō jikyu-ritsu no ‘naze’. Dōshite hikui to ikenai no ka? (The Riddle of the Food Self-Suffciency Rate: Why Should It Not Be Low?). Tokyo: Fusosha Shinsho.
  19. Tanaka, Nobuko, and Miki Miyoshi. 2012. “School Lunch Program for Health Promotion among Children in Japan.” Asia Pacifc Journal Clinical Nutrition 21, no. 1: 155–58.
  20. Tokudome, Shinkan, and Shigeru Yamamoto. 2012. “Overview of Nutrition Education Program for National Health Promotion in Asian Countries: Current Situation and Future Direction.” Asia Pacifc Journal Clinical Nutrition 21, no. 1: 127.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Assmann, S.
Corresponding author
Assmann, Stephanie
Venue
The Globalization of Asian Cuisines
Published
2015
Pages
165-185
OpenAlex
W2467117171
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
12.01
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management › Culinary Culture and Tourism
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Food, Nutrition, and Cultural Practices
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Cultural Identity and Heritage
Keywords
washoku, Japanese cuisine, UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage, national identity, culinary heritage, Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident, food safety, culinary traditions, Japan

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review