CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 84Social Capital and NetworksJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorSocial Power and Status Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Collective Trust within Organizations: Conceptual Foundations and Empirical Insights

Open access
Kramer, Roderick M·2010·Corporate Reputation Review
DOI 10.1057/crr.2010.9
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/crr.2010.9

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The emphasis on positive valence and social concepts, such as being part of one community, fosters collective trust by increasing a sense of in-group membership among users and providers.

    “The emphasis on positive valence and social concepts, such as being part of one community, fosters collective trust by increasing a sense of in-group membership among users and providers (Kramer, 2010).”

    From The Consequences of Participating in the Sharing Economy: A Transparency-Based Sharing Framework (2021) · cites this paper as Kramer, 2010

    In “Relational and Structural Underpinnings of Collective Trust” (page unavailable), Kramer explains that salient shared category membership can foster trust in other in-group members. The cited paper does not establish that an emphasis on positive valence or community language increases users’ and providers’ sense of in-group membership; that application goes beyond its organizational account. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Trust-based commercial sharing most closely maps onto the concept of collective trust within organizations, defined as a general set of beliefs about trustworthiness of a generic member of the organization.

    “As such, trust-based commercial sharing most closely maps onto the concept of collective trust within organizations, defined as a general set of beliefs about trustworthiness of a generic member of the organization (Kramer, 2010).”

    From The Consequences of Participating in the Sharing Economy: A Transparency-Based Sharing Framework (2021) · cites this paper as Kramer, 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 66

  1. Arrow, K. (1974) The Limits of Organisation, Norton, New York.
  2. Bacharach, M. and Gambetta, D. (2001) ‘Trust in signs’, in K.S. Cook (ed.), Trust in Society, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp. 148–184.
  3. Bachmann, R. and Zaheer, A. (2006) Handbook of Trust Research, Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA. · DOI
  4. Barber, B. (1983) The Logic and Limits of Trust, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswich, NJ.
  5. Bendor, J., Kramer, R.M. and Stout, S. (1991) ‘When in doubt: Cooperation in the noisy prisoner's dilemma’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 35, 691–719. · DOI
  6. Boon, S.D. and Holmes, J.G. (1991) ‘The dynamics of interpersonal trust: Resolving uncertainty in the face of risk’, in R.A. Hinde and J. Groebel (eds.), Cooperation and Prosocial Behavior, Cambridge University Press, New York.
  7. Boyle, R. and Bonacich, P. (1970) ‘The development of trust and mistrust in mixed-motives games’, Sociometry, 33, 123–139. · DOI
  8. Brewer, M.B. (1981) ‘Ethnocentrism and its role in interpersonal trust’, in M.B. Brewer and B.E. Collins (eds.), Scientific Inquiry and the Social Sciences, Jossey-Bass, New York.
  9. Brewer, M.B. (1996) ‘In-group favoritism: The subtle side of intergroup discrimination’, in D.M. Messick and A. Tenbrunsel (eds.), Behavioral Research and Business Ethics, Russell Sage, New York.
  10. Brockner, J. and Sigel, P.A. (1996) ‘Understanding the interaction between procedural and distributive justice: The role of trust’, in R.M. Kramer and T.R. Tyler (eds.), Trust in Organisations, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  11. Brockner, J., Siegel, P.A., Daly, J.P. and Tyler, T. (1997) ‘When trust matters: The moderating effects of outcome favorability’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 558–583. · DOI
  12. Bromiley, P and Cummings, L.L. (1995) ‘Transaction costs in organisations with trust’, in R. Bies, R. Lewicki and B. Sheppard (eds.), Research and Negotiations in Organizations, Vol. 5, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 219–247.
  13. Burt, R. and Knez, M. (1995) ‘Kinds of third-party effects on trust’, Journal of Rationality and Sociology, 7, 255–292. · DOI
  14. Cook, K., Kramer, R.M., Thom, D.H., Stepanikova, I., Mollborn, S.B. and Cooper, R.M. (2004) ‘Trust and distrust in physician-patient relationships: Antecedents and consequences’, in R.M. Kramer and K.S. Cook (eds.), Trust in Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches, Russell Sage, New York, pp. 65–98.
  15. Cook, K.S. (2001) Trust in Society, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
  16. Cook, K.S., Hardin, R. and Levi, M. (2005) Cooperation without Trust, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
  17. Crano, W.D. and Brewer, M.B. (2002) Principles and Methods of Social Research, 2nd edn., Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
  18. Creed, W.D. and Miles, R.E. (1996) ‘Trust in organisations: A conceptual framework linking organisational forms, managerial philosophies, and the opportunity costs of controls’, in R.M. Kramer and T.R. Tyler (eds.), Trust in Organisations, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  19. Davis, J., Schoorman, F.D., Mayer, R.C. and Tan, H. (2000) ‘The trusted general manager and business unit performance: Empirical evidence of a competitive advantage’, Strategic Management Journal, 21, 543–576. · DOI
  20. Dawes, R.M. (1994) House of Cards: Psychology and Psychotherapy Built on Myth, Free Press, New York.
  21. Dirks, K.T. (2000) ‘Trust in leadership and team performance: Evidence from NCAA basketball’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 1004–1012. · DOI
  22. Dirks, K.T. (2006) ‘Three fundamental questions regarding trust in leaders’, in R. Bachmann and A. Zaheer (eds.), Handbook of Trust Research, Edward Elgar, Northhampton, MA, pp. 15–28.
  23. Dirks, K.T. and Ferrin, D.L. (2002) ‘Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for organizational research’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 611–628. · DOI · Paper page
  24. Dirks, K.T. and Skarlicki, D.P. (2004) ‘Trust in leaders: Existing research and emerging issues’, in R.M. Kramer and K.S. Cook (eds.), Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp. 21–40.
  25. Fine, G. and Holyfield, L. (1996) ‘Secrecy, trust and dangerous leisure: Generating group cohesion in voluntary organisations’, Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 22–38. · DOI
  26. Fukuyama, F. (1995) Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, Free Press, New York.
  27. Gabarro, J.J. (1978) ‘The development of trust and expectations’, in A.G. Athos and J.J. Gabarro (eds.), Interpersonal Behavior: Communication and Understanding in Relationships, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 290–303.
  28. Gambetta, D. (1988) ‘Can we trust trust?’, in D. Gambetta (ed.), Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relationships, Basil Blackwell, Cambridge, pp. 213–237.
  29. Gambetta, D. and Hamill, H. (2005) Streetwise: How Taxi Drivers Establish Their Customers’ Trustworthiness, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
  30. Granovetter, M. (1985) ‘Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510. · DOI · Paper page
  31. Grant, A.M. and Sumanth, J.J. (2009) ‘Mission possible? The performance of prosocially motivated employees depends on manager trustworthiness’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 927–944. · DOI
  32. Hackman, J.R. (2002) Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
  33. Hardin, R. (2002) Trust and Trustworthiness, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
  34. Hume, D. (1969) Treatise on Human Nature, Penguin, Middlesex, UK.
  35. Knez, M. and Camerer, C. (1994) ‘Creating expectational assets in the laboratory: Coordination in ‘weakest link’ games’, Strategic Management Journal, 15, 101–119. · DOI
  36. Kollock, P. (1994) ‘The emergence of exchange structures: An experimental study of uncertainty, commitment and trust’, American Sociology Review, 100, 313–345. · DOI
  37. Kramer, R.M. (1998) ‘Paranoid cognition in social systems’, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 251–275. · DOI
  38. Kramer, R.M. (2002) ‘When paranoia makes sense’, Harvard Business Review, 80, 62–71.
  39. Kramer, R.M. (2009c) ‘Dilemmas and doubts’, in R.M. Kramer, A.E.Tenbrunsel and M.H. Bazerman (eds.), Social Decision Making: Social Dilemmas, Social Values, and Ethics, Routledge, New York. · DOI
  40. Kramer, R.M. (2009d) ‘Rethinking trust’, Harvard Business Review, 87, 68–78.
  41. Kramer, R.M. and Brewer, M.B. (1986) ‘Social group identity and the emergence of cooperation in resource conservation dilemmas’, in H. Wilke, C. Rutte and D. Messick (eds.), Experimental Studies of Social Dilemmas, Peter Lang Publishing Company, Frankfurt, Germany, pp. 46–61.
  42. Kramer, R.M., Brewer, M.B. and Hanna, B. (1996) ‘Collective trust and collective action in organisations: The decision to trust as a social decision’, in R.M. Kramer and T.R. Tyler (eds.), Trust in Organisations, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  43. Kramer, R.M. and Cook, K.S. (2006) Trust and Distrust within Organizations, Russell Sage Foundations, New York. · DOI
  44. Lane, C. and Bachmann, R. (1998) Trust within and between Organizations: Conceptual Issues and Empirical Applications, Oxford University Press, New York. · DOI
  45. Lewicki, R.J. and Bunker, B.B. (1995) ‘Trust in relationships: A model of trust development and decline’, in B.B. Bunker and J.Z. Rubin (eds.), Conflict, Cooperation, and Justice, Jossey Bass, San Francisco.
  46. Lindskold, S. (1978) ‘Trust development, the GRIT proposal, and the effects of conciliatory acts on conflict and cooperation’, Psychology Bulletin, 85, 772–793. · DOI
  47. March, J.G. (1994) A Primer on Decision Making, Free Press, New York.
  48. March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1989) Rediscovering Institutions: The Organisational Basis of Politics, Free Press, New York.
  49. McEvily, B., Weber, R.A., Bicchieri, C. and Ho, V.T. (2006) ‘Can groups be trusted? An experimental study of trust in collective entities’, in R. Bachmann and A. Zaheer (eds.), Handbook of Trust Research, Elgar, Northhampton, MA, pp. 52–67.
  50. Messick, D.M., Wilke, H., Brewer, M.B., Kramer, R.M., Zemke, P.E. and Lui, L. (1983) ‘Individual adaptations and structural change as solutions to social dilemmas’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 294–309. · DOI
  51. Miller, G.J. (1992) Managerial Dilemmas: The Political Economy of Hierarchies, Cambridge University Press, New York. · DOI
  52. Orbell, J., Dawes, R. and Schwartz-Shea, P. (1994) ‘Trust, social categories, and individuals: The case of gender’, Motivation and Emotion, 18, 109–128. · DOI
  53. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press (1996) Trust and Citizen Engagement in Metropolitan Philadelphia: A Case Study, Pew, Washington, DC.
  54. Pilisuk, M., Kiritz, S. and Clampitt, S. (1971) ‘Undoing deadlocks of distrust: Hip Berkeley students and the ROTC’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 15, 81–95. · DOI
  55. Pilisuk, M. and Skolnick, P. (1968) ‘Inducing trust: A test of the Osgood proposal’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 121–133. · DOI
  56. Putnam, R.D. (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  57. Salancik, G. and Pfeffer, J. (1978) ‘A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 224–253. · DOI · Paper page
  58. Shapiro, D.L., Sheppard, B.H. and Cheraskin, L. (1992) ‘Business on a handshake’, Negotiations Journal, 8, 365–377. · DOI
  59. Solomon, L. (1960) ‘The influence of some types of power relationships and game strategies upon the development of interpersonal trust’, Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 61, 223–230. · DOI
  60. Tyler, T.R. and Degoey, P. (1996) ‘Trust in organisational authorities: The influence of motive attributions on willingness to accept decisions’, in R.M. Kramer and T.R. Tyler (eds.), Trust in Organisations, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  61. Uzzi, B. (1997) ‘Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 35–67. · DOI
  62. Weber, J.M., Malhotra, D. and Murnighan, J.K. (2005) ‘Normal acts of irrational trust: Motivated attributions and the trust development process’, in B.M. Staw and R.M. Kramer (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol, 26, Elsevier Press, New York, pp. 75–102.
  63. Weick, K.E. (1993) ‘The collapse of sensemaking in organisations: The Mann Gulch disaster’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 628–652. · DOI · Paper page
  64. Weick, K.E. (1995) Sense Making in Organizations, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  65. Whitener, E.M., Brodt, S.E., Korsgaard, M.A. and Werner, J.M. (2006) ‘Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior’, in R.M. Kramer (ed.), Organizational Trust: A Reader, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 140–169. · DOI
  66. Zucker, L.G. (1986) ‘Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920’, in B.M. Staw and L.L. Cummings (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 8, pp. 53–111.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kramer, R. M.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Kramer, Roderick M
Venue
Corporate Reputation Review
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2010-06
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
82-97
ISSN
  • 1363-3589 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-1889
DOI
10.1057/crr.2010.9
OpenAlex
W1997742159
Cited by
84
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
11.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Corporate Reputation Review (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Virginia
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords
collective trust, organizational trust, generalized trust, interpersonal trust, organizational members

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review