Cited by 162Agriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentRural Development and AgricultureEconomics of Agriculture and Food Markets

Food Sovereignty and the Contemporary Food Crisis

Rosset, Peter·2008·Development

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/dev.2008.48

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This neo-colonial process impoverished millions of peasants and Indigenous peoples by displacing them from the land, resulting in many being forced into wage labor to serve the global food economy.

    “This neo-colonial process impoverished millions of peasants and Indigenous peoples by displacing them from the land, resulting in many of them being forced into wage labor to serve the global food economy [2][3][4][5][6][7].”
  • The food sovereignty movement challenged the globalized, neoliberal, industrial, capital-intensive, corporate-led model of agriculture that created destructive economic policies that marginalized small-scale farmers, removed them from their land, and forced them into the global market economy as wage laborers.

    “The food sovereignty movement challenged the hegemony of the globalized, neoliberal, industrial, capital-intensive, corporate-led model of agriculture that created destructive economic policies that marginalized small-scale farmers, removed them from their land, and forced them into the global market economy as wage laborers.”
  • La Via Campesina emphasized that the current regime continued to promote agricultural practices that benefited transnational corporations while undermining small-scale farmers.

    “They also emphasized that the current regime continued to promote agricultural practices that benefitted transnational corporations while undermining small-scale farmers [2][3][4][5][6][7].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 6 · Cited by 162

Authors
Rosset, P.
Corresponding author
Rosset, Peter
Venue
Development
Published
2008-12
Volume
51
Issue
4
Pages
460-463
ISSN
  • 1011-6370 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7072
OpenAlex
W2147104400
Cited by
162
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 13
FWCI
29.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Development (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Rural Development and Agriculture
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
Keywords
food sovereignty, peasant agriculture, family farming, La Via Campesina, food security, agricultural policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review