Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 568

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Small States in World Markets: 1985–2010

Open access
Ingebritsen, Christine·2010·European Political Science

Abstract

What is the institutional legacy of Katzenstein's 1985 work on international relations theorizing? This article places Small States in World Markets in the history of the study of power. Katzenstein's contribution endures by identifying the relationship between changes in the world economy and the capacity of states to adapt. His 1985 book opened up new paths of theorizing – from the role of norms to the ways in which smaller political economies in Europe can inform the large. Even though the issue-areas, actors, and measures of power and authority evolve, Katzenstein's analysis remains a critical benchmark for institutional/IR analysis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/eps.2010.22

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 568

Metadata

Authors
Ingebritsen, C.
Venue
European Political Science
Published
2010-08-28
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
358-358
ISSN
  • 1680-4333 (ISSN-L)
  • 1682-0983
OpenAlex
W1969838511
Cited by
568
References
0
FWCI
153.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Small States in World Markets: 1985–2010. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1057/eps.2010.22
The paper
Ingebritsen, C. (2010). Small States in World Markets: 1985–2010. European Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2010.22

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.