The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Testing Models of U.S. Foreign Policy: Foreign Aid during and after the Cold War
Abstract
The end of the Cold War has provided scholars of international relations with a unique opportunity to evaluate the explanatory power of their models in a rapidly changing environment. We provide a preliminary, exploratory test of the system-level, societal-level, and state-level explanations of U. S. foreign policy behavior during and after the Cold War We seek to determine which among the foreign policy goals suggested by these approaches best explains one important aspect of U. S. foreign policy-the provision of foreign assistance The hypotheses are tested on a pooled, cross-sectional, time series of U. S. foreign aid allocation from 1977 through 1994 While we find a great deal of similarity in the relative importance of the three approaches in explaining U. S. behavior in both eras, we also show that the security-driven goals of the systemic approach have become less critical and the ideological goals of the state-centered model more important with the passing of the Cold War.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data
Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (1995) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2082979 · Cited by 6,840
War and Change in World Politics
Gilpin, R. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511664267 · Cited by 4,020
The Penn World Table (Mark 5): An Expanded Set of International Comparisons, 1950-1988
Summers, R., & Heston, A. (1991) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2937941 · Cited by 3,429
Cited by
Changing aid regimes? U.S. foreign aid from the Cold War to the War on Terror
Fleck, R. K., & Kilby, C. (2010) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2009.09.011 · Cited by 297
D-Minus Elections: The Politics and Norms of International Election Observation
Kelley, J. (2009) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818309990117 · Cited by 153
The Global South political economy of health financing and spending landscape – history and presence
Jakovljevic, M., Liu, Y., Cerda, A., Simonyan, M., Correia, T., Mariita, R. M., Kumara, A. S., Garcia, L., Krstic, K., Osabohien, R., et al. (2021) · Journal of Medical Economics · doi:10.1080/13696998.2021.2007691 · Cited by 123
Market imperative meets normative power: Human rights and European arms transfer policy
Erickson, J. L. (2013) · European Journal of International Relations · doi:10.1177/1354066111415883 · Cited by 121
Guo, B., Fan, V., Strange, A., & Grépin, K. A. (2024) · Health Policy and Planning · doi:10.1093/heapol/czad095 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Meernik, J., Krueger, E. L., & Poe, S. C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Politics
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1998-02
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 63-85
- ISSN
- 0022-3816 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2508
- OpenAlex
- W1973280646
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 22.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Testing Models of U.S. Foreign Policy: Foreign Aid during and after the Cold War. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2648001
- The paper
- Meernik, J., Krueger, E. L., & Poe, S. C. (1998). Testing Models of U.S. Foreign Policy: Foreign Aid during and after the Cold War. The Journal of Politics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2648001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.