The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Managing the Software Process
Open accessAbstract
JIT 4,3 -September 1989 much practical enhancement of their security's effectiveness.The book is well written, easily referenced, well informed, very practical and forms a very useful introduction to the subject area.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Capability maturity model, version 1.1
Paulk, M. C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M. B., & Weber, C. V. (1993) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/52.219617 · Cited by 1,263
Orthogonal defect classification-a concept for in-process measurements
Chillarege, R., Bhandari, I. S., Chaar, J. K., Halliday, M. J., Moebus, D. S., Ray, B. K., & Wong, M.-Y. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/32.177364 · Cited by 792
Fenton, N. E., & Neil, M. (2000) · Proceedings of the Conference on The Future of Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/336512.336588 · Cited by 317
Using an expert panel to validate a requirements process improvement model
Beecham, S., Hall, T., Britton, C., Cottee, M., & Rainer, A. (2005) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2004.06.004 · Cited by 171
Interrupts: just a minute never is
van Solingen, R., Berghout, E., & van Latum, F. (1998) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/52.714843 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- W, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Information Technology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1989-09
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 172-172
- ISSN
- 0268-3962 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4437
- OpenAlex
- W4234656583
- Cited by
- 1,378
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 84.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Managing the Software Process. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1057/jit.1989.28
- The paper
- W, L. (1989). Managing the Software Process. Journal of Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.1989.28
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
