The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prediction with a Generalized Cost of Error Function
Abstract
Classical prediction theory limits itself to quadratic cost functions, and hence least-square predictors. However, the cost functions that arise in practice in economics and management situations are not likely to be quadratic in form, and frequently will be non-symmetric. It is the object of this paper to throw light on prediction in such situations and to suggest some practical implications. It is suggested that a useful, although sub-optimal, manner of taking into account generalized cost functions is to add a constant bias term to the predictor. Two theorems are proved showing that under fairly general conditions the bias term can be taken to be zero when one uses a symmetric cost function. If the cost function is a non-symmetric linear function, an expression for the bias can be simply obtained.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Quantile loss is asymmetric such that underestimates can be more costly than overestimates, and using quantile values larger than .50 makes the gradient boosting algorithm work harder to fit larger values of the response.
“Quantile loss is designed to be asymmetric such that underestimates can be more costly than overestimates. Using values of τ larger than .50, makes the gradient boosting algorithm work harder to fit larger values of the response.”
From Forecasting Extreme High Summer Temperatures in Paris and Cairo Using Gradient Boosting and Conformal Prediction Regions (2025) · cites this paper as Granger, 1969
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hoeting, J. A., Madigan, D., Raftery, A. E., & Volinsky, C. T. (1999) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1009212519 · Cited by 4,118
Berk, R. A., & Braverman, A. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.16118
Metadata
- Authors
- Granger, C. W. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Granger, C. W. J.
- Venue
- Journal of the Operational Research Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1969-06
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 199-207
- ISSN
- 0160-5682 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-9360
- OpenAlex
- W2086453666
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the Operational Research Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Forecasting Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Statistical and numerical algorithms
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Optimization
- Keywords
- prediction, generalized cost function, asymmetric loss functions, bias term, linear cost functions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review