The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Internet cigarette sales and Native American sovereignty: Political and public health contexts
Abstract
Internet cigarette vendors (ICVs) advertise low prices for tobacco products, subverting public health policy efforts to curtail smoking by raising prices. Many online retailers in the United States claim affiliation with Native American tribes and share in tribal tax-free status. Sales of discounted cigarettes from both online vendors and brick-and-mortar stores have angered non-Native retailers and triggered enforcement actions by state and federal governments in the United States concerned over lost cigarette excise tax revenue. Examination of the history and politics of cigarette sales on reservations and attempts to regulate Internet cigarette sales highlights the potential role for greater use of negotiated intergovernmental agreements to address reservation-based tobacco sales. Our review notes global parallels and explicates history and politics of such regulation in the United States, and offers background for collaborative efforts to regulate tobacco sales and decrease tobacco use.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“while Federal law requires remittance of those taxes to the state”
From Common state mechanisms regulating tribal tobacco taxation and sales, the USA, 2015 (2016) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“a state cannot force a tribe to do so where it refuses.12”
From Common state mechanisms regulating tribal tobacco taxation and sales, the USA, 2015 (2016) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“In 2010, as a means to address the loss of ∼$500 000 in state income a day to sales on tribal lands,26 New York adjusted its implementation, and began requiring that all cigarettes receive tax stamps prior to shipment to tribal distributors, reducing the opportunity for tribal distributors to opt out of state tax collection.12 33 34”
From Common state mechanisms regulating tribal tobacco taxation and sales, the USA, 2015 (2016) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“While compacts are popular, negotiating them can be time and cost intensive,12 21 and they can be difficult to use or enforce where the state–tribe relationship is fractured (eg, New York).15 26”
From Common state mechanisms regulating tribal tobacco taxation and sales, the USA, 2015 (2016) · cites this paper as [12]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- Stehr, M. (2005) Cigarette tax avoidance and evasion. Journal of Health Economics 24 (2): 277–297. · DOI · Paper page
- Associated Press. (1996) Tobacco shop on Indian land sells tax-free cigarettes by mail. The New York Times 1 December: 1.
- Cohen, J.E., Sarabia, V. and Ashley, M.J. (2001) Tobacco commerce on the internet: A threat to comprehensive tobacco control. Tobacco Control 10 (4): 364–367. · DOI
- Ribisl, K.M., Kim, A.E. and Williams, R.S. (2001) Web sites selling cigarettes: How many are there in the USA and what are their sales practices? Tobacco Control 10 (4): 352–359. · DOI
- Ribisl, K.M., Williams, R.S. and Kim, A.E. (2003) Internet sales of cigarettes to minors. JAMA 290 (10): 1356–1359. · DOI
- Hodge, F.S., Geishirt Cantrell, B.A., Struthers, R. and Casken, J. (2004) American Indian internet cigarette sales: Another avenue for selling tobacco products. American Journal of Public Health 94 (2): 260–261. · DOI · Paper page
- Bruyneel, K. (2007) The Third Space of Sovereignty: The Postcolonial Politics of US-Indigenous Relations. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
- Bonnie, R.J., Stratton, K. and Wallace, R.B. Institute of Medicine (US), eds. (2007) Ending the Tobacco Problem: A Blueprint for the Nation. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
- Chaloupka, F.J., Cummings, K., Morley, C.P. and Horan, J.K. (2002) Tax, price and cigarette smoking: Evidence from the tobacco documents and implications for tobacco company marketing strategies. Tobacco Control 11 (Suppl 1): I62–72. · DOI · Paper page
- Knowles, J.H., Wanke, K.L. and Kawachi, I. (2004) Internet sales of tobacco: Heading off the new E-pidemic. Journal of Public Health Policy 25 (2): 162–172. · DOI
- Ribisl, K.M., Kim, A.E. and Williams, R.S. (2007) Sales and marketing of cigarettes on the internet: Emerging threats to tobacco control and promising policy solutions. In: R.J. Bonnie, K. Stratton, R.B. Wallace, Institute of Medicine (US) (eds.) Ending the Tobacco Problem: A Blueprint for the Nation. Washington DC: National Academies Press, pp. M1–M26.
- Kim, A.E., Ribisl, K.M., Delnevo, C.D. and Hrywna, M. (2006) Smokers’ beliefs and attitudes about purchasing cigarettes on the internet. Public Health Reports 121 (5): 594–602. · DOI
- Hyland, A., et al (2005a) Higher cigarette prices influence cigarette purchase patterns. Tobacco Control 12 (2): 86–92. · DOI
- Hyland, A., et al (2005b) Access to low-taxed cigarettes deters smoking cessation attempts. American Journal of Public Health 95 (6): 994–995. · DOI
- Debrot, K., Tynan, M., Francis, J. and MacNeil, A. (2010) State cigarette excise taxes – United States, 2009. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 59 (13): 385–388.
- Jenkins Act. (1949) Title 15, Chapter 10A, Sections 375-378. · DOI
- Banthin, C. (2004) Cheap smokes: State and federal responses to tax evasion over the internet. Health Matrix 14 (2): 325–356.
- Gormley, M. (2005) DHL agrees to end cigarette deliveries to individuals. Associated Press 6 July.
- Ribisl, K.M., Williams, R.S., Gizlice, Z. and Herring, A.H. (2011) Effectiveness of state and federal government agreements with major credit card and shipping companies to block illegal internet cigarette sales. PLoS One 6 (2): e16754. · DOI
- Denny, C.H., Holtzman, D. and Cobb, N. (2003) Surveillance for health behaviors of American Indians and Alaska natives. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, August 52 (SS-7): 1–13.
- Giovino, G.A., et al (2009) Cigarette Smoking Prevalence and Policies in the 50 States: An Era of Change – The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation ImpacTeen Chart Book. Buffalo, NY: University at Buffalo, State University of New York.
- Linstedt, S. (2010) Seneca nation leadership calls for defeat of PACT act. Press Release 5 January.
- Zelio, J. (2009) National conference of state legislatures: Piecing together the state-tribal tax puzzle, http://www.ncsl.org/default.aspx?tabid=12662 , accessed 15 May 2009.
- Price, M. (2009) Two Oklahoma tribes sue over cigarette tax increase. Journal Record Legislative Report, 7 January; News.
- Davis, K., Farrelly, M., Li, Q. and Hyland, A. (2006) Cigarette Purchasing Patterns Among New York Smokers: Implications for Health, Price, and Revenue. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute, March.
- Associated Press. (1992) Senecas clash with police over tax ruling. The New York Times 17 July: B.
- Associated Press. (1997) Troopers break up Indian tax protest near Syracuse, Arrest 10. Buffalo News 19 May; News.
- Mohawk, J.C. (1998) Echoes of a native revitalization movement in recent Indian law cases in New York State. Buffalo Law Review 46 (3): 1061–1080.
- New York State Office of Children & Family Services (2001) A Proud Heritage: Native American Services in New York State. Rensselaer, NY: New York State Office of Children and Family Service, pp. 62–64.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Common state mechanisms regulating tribal tobacco taxation and sales, the USA, 2015
DeLong, H., Chriqui, J., Leider, J., & Chaloupka, F. J. (2016) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053079 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Samuel, K. A., Ribisl, K. M., & Williams, R. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Public Health Policy
- Published
- 2012-02-23
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 173-187
- ISSN
- 0197-5897
- 1745-655X
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
