The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analytic Hierarchy Process and Expert Choice: Benefits and limitations
Abstract
This article describes the original Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) as it is implemented in the software package Expert Choice. We demonstrate its application through a practical example. In particular, we discuss problem modelling, pairwise comparisons, judgement scales, derivation methods, consistency indices, synthesis of the weights and sensitivity analysis. Finally, the limitations of the original AHP along with the new proposed development are explained.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding
Roy, B. (1996) · Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2500-1 · Cited by 1,350
The analytic hierarchy process in medical and health care decision making: A literature review
Liberatore, M. J., & Nydick, R. L. (2008) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2007.05.001 · Cited by 569
Cited by
A bibliometric-based survey on AHP and TOPSIS techniques
Zyoud, S. H., & Fuchs-Hanusch, D. (2017) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2017.02.016 · Cited by 492
Akhtar, N., Ishak, M. I. S., Ahmad, M. I., Umar, K., Md Yusuff, M. S., Anees, M. T., Qadir, A., & Ali Almanasir, Y. K. (2021) · Water · doi:10.3390/w13070905 · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Ishizaka, A., & Labib, A.
- Venue
- OR Insight
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-10-26
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 201-220
- ISSN
- 0953-5543 (ISSN-L)
- 1759-0477
- OpenAlex
- W2013142182
- Cited by
- 609
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analytic Hierarchy Process and Expert Choice: Benefits and limitations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1057/ori.2009.10
- The paper
- Ishizaka, A., & Labib, A. (2009). Analytic Hierarchy Process and Expert Choice: Benefits and limitations. OR Insight. https://doi.org/10.1057/ori.2009.10
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
