The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transfer of knowledge in knowledge management systems: unexplored issues and suggested studies
Abstract
The management practice literature is replete with reports of practices being used to motivate a firm's knowledge workers to transfer knowledge into and out of the firm's computer resident knowledge repositories, ie, to participate with commitment in the firm's Knowledge Management System. Unfortunately, little is known with any certainty about which of these practices have what effects under which conditions. It appears that in many cases the practices are ill suited for the particular situations where they are employed, with unknown but perhaps sizeable losses in opportunities foregone because valuable knowledge is not as fully or completely transferred as is possible. In addition, it seems that some of these practices are likely to be interfering with the effectiveness of other practices, just as some drugs interfere with the potentially positive effects of other drugs. About these matters, our knowledge is exceeded by our ignorance. The paper identifies some major problems associated with knowledge transfer, and articulates some of the most important issues associated with these problems. Eight research questions are raised that, if answered with sound studies, would enable organisations to be more effective in their transfer of knowledge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm
Szulanski, G. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171105 · Cited by 7,839
Cited by
Mettler, T., & Winter, R. (2016) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/jit.2015.28 · Cited by 47
Group awareness and self-presentation in the information-exchange dilemma: an interactional approach
Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2007) · Proceedings of the 8th iternational conference on Computer supported collaborative learning - CSCL'07 · doi:10.3115/1599600.1599671 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Huber, G. P.
- Venue
- European Journal of Information Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 72-79
- ISSN
- 0960-085X (ISSN-L)
- 1476-9344
- OpenAlex
- W1986409288
- Cited by
- 416
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 38.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.