Cited by 47Knowledge Management and SharingInformation Systems Theories and ImplementationTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour

Are business users social? A design experiment exploring information sharing in enterprise social systems

Open access
Mettler, Tobias, Winter, Robert·2016·Journal of Information Technology

Abstract

In recent years, social technology has changed the ways people collaborate and communicate. With the blurring boundaries between work and personal life, business software vendors have begun to deliberate on the possibilities for enhancing the rather rigid and impersonal structures in enterprise systems (ES) by integrating social features. In doing so, they frequently assume that business users share the same interaction patterns as private users. In this paper, we challenge this belief and explore the factors that stimulate business users to share information in ES environments. By means of a design experiment, we show different use scenarios and explore business users' attitudes toward open and unconditional information sharing in ES. Our results demonstrate that business users are less ‘social’ and that applying social features in ES is highly context dependent. Based on these findings, we offer recommendations for software vendors and researchers who are interested in the social enhancements of ES.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/jit.2015.28

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing IS research largely emphasizes the contrasts between traditional enterprise systems and social information systems.

    “However, instead of investigating entanglements of social and traditional enterprise systems, existing information systems (IS) research largely emphasizes the contrasts between traditional enterprise systems and social information systems (Koch 2008;Mettler and Winter 2016).”
  • The four dimensions (alignment, control, interoperability, efficiency) are well-known affordances of traditional enterprise systems.

    “In turn, these four dimensions (i.e., alignment, control, interoperability, efficiency) are well-known affordances of traditional enterprise systems (Mettler and Winter 2016).”
  • Chatbots augment social information systems with the affordances of traditional enterprise systems proposed by Mettler and Winter (2016).

    “We contribute to the body of social information systems by elucidating how chatbots augment social information systems with the affordances of traditional enterprise systems proposed by Mettler and Winter (2016).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mettler, T., & Winter, R.
Affiliations
University of St.Gallen (CH)
Venue
Journal of Information Technology
Published
2016-06
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
101-114
ISSN
  • 0268-3962 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4437
OpenAlex
W2277015842
Cited by
47
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
10.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Information Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) (acceptedVersion)
  • Journal of the Association for Information Systems (submittedVersion)
  • Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Universität St. Gallen
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Knowledge Management and Sharing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Keywords
information sharing, business users, social technology, user attitudes, work-life boundary blurring, collaboration, context sensitivity, software companies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review