Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 270

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 134 of the 134 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluation and Decision Models: a Critical Perspective: D Bouyssou, T Marchant, M Pirlot, P Perny, A Tsoukiàs and P Vincke, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000. viii + 274 pp. £77.00 ISBN: 0-7923-7250-6

French, S·2002·Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

"Evaluation and Decision Models: a Critical Perspective." Journal of the Operational Research Society, 53(7), p. 809

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601380

Cites

134 of 134 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 134 references

Cited by

See all 270

Metadata

Authors
French, S.
Venue
Journal of the Operational Research Society
Published
2002-07
Volume
53
Issue
7
Pages
809-809
ISSN
  • 0160-5682 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-9360
OpenAlex
W2045443334
Cited by
270
References
134
FWCI
17.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation and Decision Models: a Critical Perspective: D Bouyssou, T Marchant, M Pirlot, P Perny, A Tsoukiàs and P Vincke, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000. viii + 274 pp. £77.00 ISBN: 0-7923-7250-6. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601380
The paper
French, S. (2002). Evaluation and Decision Models: a Critical Perspective: D Bouyssou, T Marchant, M Pirlot, P Perny, A Tsoukiàs and P Vincke, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000. viii + 274 pp. £77.00 ISBN: 0-7923-7250-6. Journal of the Operational Research Society. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601380

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.