Cited by 100Stress Responses and CortisolStress and Burnout ResearchChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Stress and emotion: a new synthesis

Harris, Claire·2001·Risk Management

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/palgrave.rm.8240089

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Primary and secondary appraisal are interdependent, have a mutual influence, and are parts of a common process known as anticipatory cognitive stress appraisal.

    “As proposed by Lazarus (2001), primary and secondary appraisal are interdependent, they have a mutual influence (e.g., a low secondary appraisal can only be interpreted if scores in primary appraisal are taken into account), and they are parts of a common process known as anticipatory cognitive stress appraisal.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harris, C.
Affiliations
University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Harris, Claire
Venue
Risk Management
Published
2001-04
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
69-70
ISSN
  • 1460-3799 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-4637
OpenAlex
W2009251276
Cited by
100
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Risk Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
stress, emotions, psychological stress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review