The DOI matches its Crossref record; 134 of the 134 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reconciling theory and context: How the case study can set a new agenda for international business research
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Case Study Research: Design and Methods
Chaiklin, H. (1991) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-199102000-00025 · Cited by 39,535
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
(1963) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 15,085
Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428112452151 · Cited by 13,227
The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays.
Colson, E., & Geertz, C. (1975) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2064031 · Cited by 9,103
Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis
Pierson, P. (2004) · doi:10.1515/9781400841080 · Cited by 4,957 · cited 3×
“By making ‘contextualization’ the other key dimension in our matrix (Figure 1), we were taking the stance that theorizing from case studies requires context to be treated as explanatory, not as descriptive, material (Pierson, 2004).”
BackgroundSystematic combining: an abductive approach to case research
Dubois, A., & Gadde, L.-E. (2002) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(00)00195-8 · Cited by 4,941
Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond
Ragin, C. C. (2008) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226702797.001.0001 · Cited by 4,445
Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice
Pettigrew, A. M. (1990) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1.3.267 · Cited by 4,221
The Nature of Theory in Information Systems1
Gregor, S. (2006) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148742 · Cited by 3,306 · cited 3×
“In IB, unlike in other fields (e.g., Abend, 2008; Cornelissen et al., 2021; Delbridge & Fiss, 2013; Gregor, 2006), we are yet to have a debate about what theory is,4 or the potential that lies in diversifying our styles of theorizing.”
Background
Cited by
Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2024) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069241229777 · Cited by 294
Do economic sanctions work? Evidence from the Russia-Ukraine conflict
Gaur, A., Settles, A., & Väätänen, J. (2023) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12933 · Cited by 120
Positioning context front and center in international human resource management research
Farndale, E., Bonache, J., McDonnell, A., & Kwon, B. (2023) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12483 · Cited by 61
Multilevel qualitative research: Insights from practice
Köhler, T. (2024) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2024.03.011 · Cited by 22
Poorrezaei, M., Pich, C., & Resnick, S. (2023) · Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/qmr-07-2022-0120 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Welch, C., Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, E., Piekkari, R., & Plakoyiannaki, E.
- Venue
- Journal of International Business Studies
- Published
- 2022-01-14
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4-26
- ISSN
- 0047-2506 (ISSN-L)
- 1478-6990
- OpenAlex
- W4206269775
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 134
- FWCI
- 40.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reconciling theory and context: How the case study can set a new agenda for international business research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1057/s41267-021-00484-5
- The paper
- Welch, C., Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, E., Piekkari, R., & Plakoyiannaki, E. (2022). Reconciling theory and context: How the case study can set a new agenda for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00484-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
