CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 22Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsBusiness and Management StudiesBusiness Strategies and Management Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multilevel qualitative research: Insights from practice

Open access
Köhler, Tine·2024·European Management Journal
DOI 10.1016/j.emj.2024.03.011
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In this paper, I provide insights from a multilevel, qualitative research project, focusing specifically on the rationale underlying the employed methodological choices. The purpose of this paper is to showcase, through a detailed account of one specific case, the considerations researchers conducting qualitative multilevel research may ponder in their research design. This complements the papers included in this management focus issue examining organizational research integration. The methodological choices explored in this paper can assist researchers in designing their own qualitative multilevel organizational research projects.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.emj.2024.03.011

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. Barley, 1986, Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments, Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 78, 10.2307/2392767 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Barley, 1997, Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution, Organization Studies, 18, 93, 10.1177/017084069701800106 · DOI
  3. Bechky, 2006, Gaffers, gofers, and grips: Role-based coordination in temporary organizations, Organization Science, 17, 3, 10.1287/orsc.1050.0149 · DOI
  4. Bliese, 2007, Multilevel methods: Future directions in measurement, longitudinal analyses, and nonnormal outcomes, Organizational Research Methods, 10, 551, 10.1177/1094428107301102 · DOI
  5. Chen, 2005, Conceptual framework and statistical procedures for delineating and testing multilevel theories of homology, Organizational Research Methods, 8, 375, 10.1177/1094428105280056 · DOI
  6. Cramton, 2014, An embedded model of cultural adaptation in global teams, Organization Science, 25, 1056, 10.1287/orsc.2013.0885 · DOI
  7. Cramton, 2021, Using scripts to address cultural and institutional challenges of global project coordination, Journal of International Business Studies, 52, 56, 10.1057/s41267-020-00337-7 · DOI
  8. Dille, 2011, Managing inter-institutional projects: The significance of isochronism, timing norms and temporal misfits, International Journal of Project Management, 29, 480, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.02.007 · DOI
  9. Eccles, 1981, The quasifirm in the construction industry, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2, 335, 10.1016/0167-2681(81)90013-5 · DOI
  10. Eisenhardt, 1989, Building theories from case study research, Academy of Management Review, 14, 532, 10.2307/258557 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Faraj, 2006, Coordination in fast-response organizations, Management Science, 52, 1155, 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0526 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Flick, 1992, Triangulation revisited. Strategy of or alternative to validation of qualitative data, Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 22, 175, 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1992.tb00215.x · DOI
  13. Gersick, 1991, Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm, Academy of Management Review, 16, 10, 10.2307/258605 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Harley, 2022, Rigor with or without templates? The pursuit of methodological rigor in qualitative research, Organizational Research Methods, 25, 239, 10.1177/1094428120937786 · DOI
  15. Henjewele, 2014, Comparative performance of healthcare and transport PFI projects: Empirical study on the influence of key factors, International Journal of Project Management, 32, 77, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.01.008 · DOI
  16. Hernaus, 2020, Integrating organizational research–Individual, team, organizational and multilevel perspectives, European Management Journal, 38, 217, 10.1016/j.emj.2020.03.001 · DOI
  17. Hitt, 2007, Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels: Multilevel research in management, Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1385, 10.5465/amj.2007.28166219 · DOI
  18. House, 1995, The meso paradigm: A framework for the integration of micro and macro organizational behavior, Research in Organizational Behavior, 17, 71
  19. Jarvenpaa, 2011, Hallowed grounds: The role of cultural values, practices, and institutions in TMS in an offshored complex engineering services project, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 58, 786, 10.1109/TEM.2010.2091133 · DOI
  20. Jarzabkowski, 2004, Strategy as practice: Recursiveness, adaptation, and practices-in-use, Organization Studies, 25, 529, 10.1177/0170840604040675 · DOI
  21. Jarzabkowski, 2017, We have to do this and that? You must be joking: Constructing and responding to paradox through humor, Organization Studies, 38, 433, 10.1177/0170840616640846 · DOI
  22. Jarzabkowski, 2012, Toward a theory of coordinating: Creating coordinating mechanisms in practice, Organization Science, 23, 907, 10.1287/orsc.1110.0693 · DOI
  23. Jarzabkowski, 2013, Responding to competing strategic demands: How organizing, belonging, and performing paradoxes coevolve, Strategic Organization, 11, 245, 10.1177/1476127013481016 · DOI
  24. Kaplan, 2013, Temporal work in strategy making, Organization Science, 24, 965, 10.1287/orsc.1120.0792 · DOI
  25. Klein, 1994, Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis, Academy of Management Review, 19, 195, 10.2307/258703 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Klein, 2000, From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research, Organizational Research Methods, 3, 211, 10.1177/109442810033001 · DOI
  27. Köhler, 2012, The meeting genre across cultures: Insights from German-American collaborations, Small Group Research, 43, 159, 10.1177/1046496411429600 · DOI
  28. Köhler, 2022, Culture-driven scripts for meetings: An integrative theoretical lens for studying workplace meetings, Organizational Psychology Review
  29. Kozlowski, 2013, Advancing multilevel research design: Capturing the dynamics of emergence, Organizational Research Methods, 16, 581, 10.1177/1094428113493119 · DOI
  30. Lehmann-Willenbrock, 2014, Observing culture: Differences in U.S.-American and German team meeting behaviors, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17, 252, 10.1177/1368430213497066 · DOI
  31. Lerman, 2022, Tracing ideas from Langley (1999): Exemplars, adaptations, considerations, and overlooked, Organizational Research Methods, 25, 285, 10.1177/1094428120915510 · DOI
  32. Levina, 2009, Understanding shifting power relations within and across organizations: A critical genre analysis, Academy of Management Journal, 52, 672, 10.5465/amj.2009.43669902 · DOI
  33. Locke, 2022, Coding practices and iterativity: Beyond templates for analyzing qualitative data, Organizational Research Methods, 25, 262, 10.1177/1094428120948600 · DOI
  34. Mahalingam, 2007, Institutional theory as a framework for analyzing conflicts on global projects, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133, 517, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:7(517) · DOI
  35. Mees-Buss, 2022, From templates to heuristics: How and why to move beyond the gioia methodology, Organizational Research Methods, 25, 405, 10.1177/1094428120967716 · DOI
  36. Newburry, 2006, Standardization preferences: A function of national culture, work interdependence and local embeddedness, Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 44, 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400179 · DOI
  37. Okhuysen, 2009, Coordination in organizations: An integrative perspective, The Academy of Management Annals, 3, 463, 10.5465/19416520903047533 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Orlikowski, 1994, Genre repertoire: The structuring of communicative practices in organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 541, 10.2307/2393771 · DOI
  39. Orr, 2008, Institutional exceptions on global projects: A process model, Global Projects: Institutional and Political Challenges, 135
  40. Pettigrew, 2012, Context and action in the transformation of the firm: A reprise, Journal of Management Studies, 49, 1304, 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01054.x · DOI
  41. Pratt, 2000, The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: Managing identification among Amway distributors, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 456, 10.2307/2667106 · DOI
  42. Pratt, 2008, Fitting oval pegs into round holes: Tensions in evaluating and publishing qualitative research in top-tier North American journals, Organizational Research Methods, 11, 481, 10.1177/1094428107303349 · DOI
  43. Pratt, 2022, Moving beyond templates: A bricolage approach to conducting trustworthy qualitative research, Organizational Research Methods, 25, 211, 10.1177/1094428120927466 · DOI
  44. Rai, 2009, Offshore information systems project success: The role of social embeddedness and cultural characteristics, MIS Quarterly, 33, 617, 10.2307/20650313 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Rogelberg, 2010, Employee satisfaction with meetings: A contemporary facet of job satisfaction, Human Resource Management, 49, 149, 10.1002/hrm.20339 · DOI
  46. Smets, 2015, Reinsurance trading in Lloyd's of London: Balancing conflicting-yet-complementary logics in practice, Academy of Management Journal, 58, 932, 10.5465/amj.2012.0638 · DOI
  47. Tenzer, 2021, The impact of language barriers on knowledge processing in multinational teams, Journal of World Business, 56, 10.1016/j.jwb.2020.101184 · DOI
  48. Turner, 2017, Research design for mixed methods: A triangulation-based framework and roadmap, Organizational Research Methods, 20, 243, 10.1177/1094428115610808 · DOI
  49. Welch, 2022, Reconciling theory and context: How the case study can set a new agenda for international business research, Journal of International Business Studies, 53, 4, 10.1057/s41267-021-00484-5 · DOI
  50. Yates, 2002, Genre systems: Structuring interaction through communicative norms, Journal of Business Communication, 39, 13, 10.1177/002194360203900102 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Beyond Numbers

    Sheu, F.-R. (2025) · International Journal of Librarianship · doi:10.23974/ijol.2025.vol10.4.575 · Cited by 1

    “Qualitative methods are especially advantageous under such conditions because they are adaptable, low-cost, and scalable (Kohler, 2024; Lim, 2025).”

See all 22

Metadata

Authors
Köhler, T.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Köhler, Tine
ORCID
Köhler, Tine
Venue
European Management Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-08
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
503-514
ISSN
0263-2373 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.emj.2024.03.011
OpenAlex
W4393066964
Cited by
22
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7
FWCI
27.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • European Management Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • University of Melbourne Faculty of Business and Economics
  • National Science Foundation (1025682)
  • Stanford University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Business and International Management › Business and Management Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Management Research
Keywords
research design, methodological choices, organizational analysis, case study design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multilevel qualitative research: Insights from practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.emj.2024.03.011
The paper
Köhler, T. (2024). Multilevel qualitative research: Insights from practice. European Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2024.03.011