Cited by 0Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationCitizenship Education and DemocracyEducator Training and Historical Pedagogy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

A compensatory boost: how does an open classroom climate moderate a weak political socialisation background?

Open access
Hannuksela, Venla Rea Kirsikka·2026·Acta Politica

Abstract

Schools have long been expected to promote psychological political engagement, particularly among less advantaged groups. Previously, an open classroom climate (OCC) has been recognised as a potential equaliser, yet the exact mechanisms behind this remain unclear. Building on social learning theory, I assume that both individual perceptions and class-level experiences of an open classroom climate may enhance political engagement. Analysing a nationwide dataset of 15–16-year-olds ( N = 5,220) in a multilevel OLS design, I examine whether open classroom climate at the class level or at the individual level is associated with diminished differences in political engagement operationalised as political interest and political self-efficacy between adolescents from strong and weak backgrounds of political socialisation by parents, peers and media. The results show that an open classroom climate at the class level is positively associated with both political interest and political self-efficacy with no evidence of moderation by socialisation background. However, more positive individual-level perceptions of OCC are more strongly associated with political engagement among adolescents with weaker political socialisation backgrounds. Consequently, class-level open classroom climate may provide vicarious exposure to pluralistic discussions for all students, while individual perceptions of OCC may be particularly relevant for adolescents with weaker socialisation elsewhere.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/s41269-026-00441-w

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Almond, G. A., and J. S. Coleman. 1960. The Politics of the Developing Areas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  2. Amnå, E., M. Ekström, M. Kerr, and H. Stattin. 2009. Political socialization and human agency: The development of civic engagement from adolescence to adulthood. Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift 111(1):27–40.
  3. Arens, K. A., and R. Watermann. 2017. Political efficacy in adolescence: Development, gender differences, and outcome relations. Developmental Psychology 53(5):933–948. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000300 · DOI
  4. Bandura, A. 1977. Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  5. Barber, C., S. O. Sweetwood, and M. King. 2015. Creating classroom-level measures of citizenship education climate. Learning Environment Research 18:197–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-015-9180-7 · DOI
  6. Barr, D. J., R. Levy, C. Scheepers, and H. J. Tily. 2013. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68(3):255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Beaumont, E. 2011. Promoting political agency, addressing political inequality: A multilevel model of internal political efficacy. The Journal of Politics 73(1):216–231. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381610000976 · DOI
  8. Campbell, D. E. 2008. Voice in the classroom: How an open classroom climate fosters political engagement among adolescents. Political Behavior 30:437–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-008-9063-z · DOI
  9. Claes, E., M. Hooghe, and S. Marien. 2012. A two-year panel study among Belgian late adolescents on the impact of school environment characteristics on political trust. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 24(2):208–224. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edr031 · DOI
  10. Deimel, D., B. Hoskins, and H. J. Abs. 2020. How do schools affect inequalities in political participation: Compensation of social disadvantage or provision of differential access? Educational Psychology 40(2):146–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1645305 · DOI
  11. Eckstein, K., P. Jugert, P. Noack, M. Born, and T. Sener. 2015. Comparing correlates of civic engagement between immigrant and majority youth in Belgium, Germany, and Turkey. Research in Human Development 12(1–2):44–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2015.1010346 · DOI
  12. Finkel, S. E. 1985. Reciprocal effects of participation and political efficacy: A panel analysis. American Journal of Political Science 29(4):891–913. · DOI
  13. Gainous, J., and A. M. Martens. 2012. The effectiveness of civic education: Are good teachers actually good for all students? American Politics Research 40(2):232–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X11419492 · DOI
  14. Gidengil, E., H. Wass, and M. Valaste. 2016. Political socialization and voting: The parent–child link in turnout. Political Research Quarterly 69(2):373–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912916640900 · DOI
  15. Hannuksela, V. 2024. Explaining the gap: Why do Swedish-speaking minority youth have higher political self-efficacy than Finnish-speaking majority youth? Scandinavian Political Studies 47(1):72–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12265 · DOI
  16. Hooghe, M., and Y. Dejaeghere. 2007. Does the ‘monitorial citizen’ exist? An empirical investigation into the occurrence of postmodern forms of citizenship in the Nordic countries. Scandinavian Political Studies 30(2):249–271. · DOI
  17. Hoskins, B., J. G. Janmaat, and G. Melis. 2017. Tackling inequalities in political socialisation: A systematic analysis of access to and mitigation effects of learning citizenship at school. Social Science Research 68:88–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.09.001 · DOI
  18. Knowles, R. T., and J. McCafferty-Wright. 2015. Connecting an open classroom climate to social movement citizenship: A study of 8th graders in Europe using IEA ICCS data. The Journal of Social Studies Research 39:255–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2015.03.002 · DOI
  19. Kosunen, S., V. Bernelius, P. Seppänen, and M. Porkka. 2016. Pupil admission to lower secondary schools and mechanisms of school segregation in urban Finland. Urban Education, advance online publication 21 October. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085916666933 · DOI
  20. Kudrnáč, A., and P. Lyons. 2018a. Political inequality among youth: Do discussions foster a sense of internal political efficacy? Young 26(5): 484–504. https://doi.org/10.1177/1103308817738847 · DOI
  21. Kudrnáč, A., and P. Lyons. 2018b. Can political inequality be reduced in the classroom? Testing the compensation hypothesis and the BFLPE on youth civic competence. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 29(2):204–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2017.1400444 · DOI
  22. Levy, B. L. M. 2013. An empirical exploration of factors related to adolescents’ political efficacy. Educational Psychology 33(3):357–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.772774 · DOI
  23. Manganelli, S., F. Lucidi, and F. Alivernini. 2015. Italian adolescents’ civic engagement and open classroom climate: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 41:8–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2015.07.001 · DOI
  24. Marien, S. 2017. Assessing the role of television, the family, and the school in the development of political trust in adolescence. Social Science Quarterly 98(3):818–835. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12433 · DOI
  25. Maurissen, L., E. Claes, and C. Barber. 2018. Deliberation in citizenship education: How the school context contributes to the development of an open classroom climate. Social Psychology of Education 21:951–972. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-018-9449-7 · DOI
  26. McDevitt, M., and S. Chaffee. 2002. From top-down to trickle-up influence: Revisiting assumptions about the family in political socialization. Political Communication 19(3):281–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/01957470290055501 · DOI
  27. Miranda, D. 2023. Socio-economic inequalities of families and their differential impact on types of political participation in the new generation of 24 countries. International Journal of Social Psychology 38(3):602–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2023.2239576 · DOI
  28. Oser, J., A. Grinson, S. Boulianne, and E. Halperin. 2022. How political efficacy relates to online and offline political participation: A multilevel meta-analysis. Political Communication 39(5):607–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2022.2086329 · DOI
  29. Persson, M. 2015. Classroom climate and political learning: Findings from a Swedish panel study and comparative data. Political Psychology 36(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12179 · DOI
  30. Quintelier, E. 2015. Engaging adolescents in politics: The longitudinal effect of political socialization agents. Youth & Society 47(1):51–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X13507295 · DOI
  31. Sampermans, D., E. Claes, and J. G. Janmaat. 2021. Back on track? How civic learning opportunities widen the political knowledge gap in a tracked education system. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 32(2):241–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1830125 · DOI
  32. Šerek, J., and H. Machackova. 2019. Role of school climate and personality in the development of Czech adolescents’ political self-efficacy. Applied Developmental Science 23(3):203–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2017.1364163 · DOI
  33. Šerek, J., and T. Umemura. 2015. Changes in late adolescents’ voting intentions during the election campaign: Disentangling the effects of political communication with parents, peers and media. European Journal of Communication 30(3):285–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323115577306 · DOI
  34. Sherrod, L. R., J. Torney-Purta, and C. A. Flanagan. eds. 2010. Handbook of Research on Civic Engagement in Youth. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  35. Sohl, S., and C. Arensmeier. 2015. The school’s role in youths’ political efficacy: can school provide a compensatory boost to students’ political efficacy? Research Papers in Education 30(2):133–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2014.908408 · DOI
  36. Välijärvi, J., and S. Sulkunen. 2016. Finnish school in international comparison. pp. 3–21. In: Niemi, H., Toom, A. and Kallioniemi, A. (eds.) Miracle of Education: The Principles and Practices of Teaching and Learning in Finnish Schools (Second Revised Edition). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  37. Weinberg, J. 2022. Civic education as an antidote to inequalities in political participation? New evidence from English secondary education. British Politics 17:185–209. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-021-00186-4 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Hannuksela, V. R. K.
Affiliations
University of Helsinki (FI)
Corresponding author
Hannuksela, Venla Rea Kirsikka
Venue
Acta Politica
Published
2026-08-24
ISSN
  • 0001-6810 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-1416
OpenAlex
W7204130756
Cited by
0
References
32
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Politica (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
  • Tampere University Institutional Repository (Tampere University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Tampere University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Education › Citizenship Education and Democracy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
Keywords
political socialization, political participation, political interest, political self-efficacy, adolescents, social learning theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review