Cited by 3AI in Service InteractionsDigital Marketing and Social MediaTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour

Examining Humanized Bot Interaction for the Retail Revenue Growth

Kumar, Nishant, Garg, Pratibha, Gupta, Neha, Upreti, Kamal·2026·Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/s41272-025-00549-2

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Kumar, N., Garg, P., Gupta, N., & Upreti, K.
Affiliations
  • Christ University (IN)
  • Amity University (IN)
  • CHRIST (Deemed to be) University, Delhi NCR (IN)
Corresponding author
Kumar, Nishant
Venue
Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management
Published
2025-08-03
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
25-40
ISSN
  • 1476-6930 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-657X
OpenAlex
W4412869987
Cited by
3
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 3
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Keywords
chatbots, human-bot interaction, anthropomorphism, social presence, personalization, media richness, customer engagement, purchase decision, trust, price fairness, e-commerce, customer loyalty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review