CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 20Folklore, Mythology, and Literature StudiesLanguage and cultural evolutionLinguistic research and analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cultural entrenchment of folktales is encoded in language

Open access
Karsdorp, Folgert, Fonteyn, Lauren·2019·Palgrave Communications
DOI 10.1057/s41599-019-0234-9
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

In this interdisciplinary study, we explore the understudied effects of growing cultural entrenchment on the form of stories with a long reproduction history. Drawing on insight from literary theory, theoretical linguistics, and cultural evolution theory, we argue that changes in the cultural entrenchment of fairy tales and folk stories are reflected in (small) structural ‘mutations’ in the story. More specifically, we aim to show that with the increasing familiarity of “Little Red Riding Hood”, its story frame and characters have gradually become part of the author and audience’s shared world knowledge, which is encoded in the type of linguistic devices used to introduce the characters. To this end, we performed a Bayesian logistic regression analysis on a diachronic collection (late 18th century–2015) of the world’s most iconic fairy tale, using automatically generated time estimations for a subset of undated reproductions in the story lineage, and including these estimates and approximated measurement errors in the statistical model. Results show that there is indeed a marked increase of linguistic markers that indicate that the characters are already known or “accessible” to the audience. This development reflects the author’s changing intuitions and beliefs about the familiarity of the story, and, indirectly, the changing expectations of the story’s audience regarding the appearance of certain characters in the story frame. Notably, this study is the first to quantitatively describe the diachronic development of a story (and the concepts associated with it) into the realm of ‘shared knowledge’, showing that it is a slow and gradual process. The results help refine our understanding of cultural evolution as well as the workings of speaker-addressee dynamics. Conceptualising the observed linguistic mutations as an instance of guided variation, we argue that the increase of definite first mentions as a function of cultural entrenchment can be treated as an example of variation guided by pragmatic principles such as Grice’s Maxim of Quantity, making character introductions as informative as (and not more informative than) required.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/s41599-019-0234-9

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 64

  1. Abbott B (2010) Reference. Oxford University Press, Oxford
  2. Acerbi A, Kendal J, Tehrani JJ (2017) Cultural complexity and demography: the case of folktales. Evol Human Behav 38(4):474–480 · DOI
  3. Bamman D, Carney M, Gillick J, Hennesy C, Sridhar V (2017) Estimating the date of first publication in a large-scale digital library. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. IEEE Press · DOI
  4. Bebbington K, MacLeod C, Ellison M, Fay N (2017) The sky is falling: evidence of a negativity bias in the social transmission of information. Evol Human Behav 38(1):92–101 · DOI
  5. Beckett S (2002) Recycling red riding hood. Routledge, New York, London
  6. Beckett S (2008) Red riding hood for all ages: a fairy-tale icon in cross-cultural contexts. Wayne State University Press, Detroit
  7. Bentley RA, Lipo C, Herzog H, Hahn M (2007) Regular rates of popular culture change reflect random copying. Evol Human Behav 28(3):151–158 · DOI
  8. Bentley AR (2008) Random drift versus selection in academic vocabulary: an evolutionary analysis of published keywords. PLoS One 3(8):e3057. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003057 · DOI
  9. Blackwell M, Honaker J, King G (2017) A unified approach to measurement error and missing data: overview and applications. Sociol Methods Res 46(3):303–341 · DOI
  10. Bortolini E, Pagani L, Crema ER, Sarno S, Barbieri C, Boattini A, Sazzini M, Da Silva SG, Martini G, Metspalu M, Pettener D, Luiselli D, Tehrani JJ (2017) Inferring patterns of folktale diffusion using genomic data. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114(34):9140–9145 · DOI
  11. Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1985) Culture and the evolutionary process. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, London
  12. Broekhuis H, Keizer E (2012) Syntax of Dutch: nouns and noun phrases, Vol. 1. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam
  13. Bürkner PC (2017) brms: an R package for Bayesian multilevel models using stan. J Stat Softw 80(1):1–28 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Clark HH, Marshall CR (1981) Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In: Joshi AK, Webber BL, Sag IA (eds) Elements of discourse understanding. Cambridge University Press, New York
  15. Christophersen P (1939) The articles: a study of their theory and use in english. Munksgaard, Copenhagen
  16. Da Silva SG, Tehrani JJ (2016) Comparative phylogenetic analyses uncover the ancient roots of Indo-European folktales. R Soc Open Sci 3(1):150645. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150645 · DOI
  17. Epstein R (1999) Roles, frames and definiteness. In: Van Hoek K, Kibrik AA, Noordman L (eds) Discourse studies in cognitive linguistics. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, p 53–74 · DOI
  18. Epstein R (2002) The definite article, accessibility, and the construction of discourse referents. Cogn Linguist 12(4):333–378 · DOI
  19. Garcia-Fernandez A, Ligozat AL, Dinarelli M, Bernhard D (2011) When was it written? Automatically determining publication dates. In: International symposium on string processing and information retrieval. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 221–236 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Gelman A, Rubin DB (1992) Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Stat Sci 7:457–472 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Gelman A, Jakulin A, Grazia Pittau M, Su YS (2008) A weakly informative default prior distribution for logistic and other regression models. Ann Appl Stat 2(4):1360–1383 · DOI
  22. Ghosh J, Li Y, Mitra R (2018) On the use of cauchy prior distributions for bayesian logistic regression. Bayesian Anal 13(2):359–383 · DOI
  23. Ghirlanda S, Acerbi A, Herzog H (2014) Dog movie stars and dog breed popularity: a case study in media influence on choice. PLoS One 9(9):e106565–5. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106565 · DOI
  24. Givón T (1984) Syntax: a functional-typological introduction, vol. 1. John Benjamins, Amsterdam · DOI
  25. Grice HP (1975) Logic and conversation. In: Cole P, Morgan JL (eds) Syntax and semantics: 3. Speech acts. Academic Press, New York, p 41–58
  26. Gundel JK, Hedberg N, Zacharski R (1993) Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69(2):274–307 · DOI
  27. Hahn M, Bentley RA (2003) Drift as a mechanism for cultural change: an example from baby names. Proc R Soc B: Biol Sci 270:S120–S123 · DOI
  28. Hawkins JA (1978) Definiteness and indefiniteness. Croom Helm, London
  29. Hawkins JA (1991) On (in)definite articles: implicatures and (un)grammaticality prediction. J Linguist 27(2):405–442 · DOI
  30. Heath C, Bell C, Sternberg E (2001) Emotional selection in memes: the case of urban legends. J Personal Social Psychol 81:1028–1041 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Hickmann M, Kail M, Roland F (1995) Cohesive anaphoric relations in French children’s narratives as a function of mutual knowledge. First Lang 15(45):277–300 · DOI
  32. Hoffman MD, Gelman A (2014) The No-U-Turn Sampler: adaptively setting path lengths in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. J Mach Learn Res 15(1):1593–1623
  33. Horn LR, Abbott B (2010) <the, a>: (in)definiteness and implicature. In: Campbell JK, Kabasenche W, O’Rourke M (eds) Reference and referring, topics in contemporary philosophy, Vol. 10. MIT Press, Cambridge
  34. Hutchinson S, Louwerse M (2018) Extracting social networks from language statistics. Discourse Process 55(7):607–618 · DOI
  35. De Jong F, Rode H, Hiemstra D (2005) Temporal language models for the disclosure of historical text. In Humanities, computers and cultural heritage: Proceedings of the XVIth International Conference of the Association for History and Computing (AHC 2005)
  36. Kail M, Hickmann M (1992) French children’s ability to introduce referents in narratives as a function of mutual knowledge. First Lang 12(34):73–94 · DOI
  37. Karsdorp F, Van den Bosch A (2016) The structure and evolution of story networks. R Soc Open Sci 3(6):160071. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160071 · DOI
  38. Kimball A, Kailen Shantz E, Eager C, Roy J (2018) Confronting quasi-separation in logistic mixed effects for linguistic data: a Bayesian approach. J Quant Linguistics https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2018.1499457 · DOI
  39. Kulkarni V, Tian Y, Dandiwala P, Skiena S (2018) Simple neologism based domain independent models to predict year of authorship. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 202–212
  40. Kumar A, Lease M, Baldridge J (2011) Supervised language modeling for temporal resolution of texts. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management. ACM: Glasgow, Scotland, UK, pp. 2069–2072 · DOI
  41. Louwerse MM, Zwaan RA (2009) Language encodes geographical information. Cogn Sci 33:51–73 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Mesoudi A (2011) Cultural evolution. How Darwinian theory can explain human culture and synthesize the social sciences. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, London · DOI · Paper page
  43. Milsark G (1974) Existential sentences in english. MIT, Cambridge, Doctoral dissertation
  44. Piironen J, Vehtari A (2017) Comparison of Bayesian predictive methods for model selection. Stat Comput 27:711 · DOI
  45. Piironen J, Paasiniemi M, Vehtari A (2018) Projective inference in high-dimensional problems: prediction and feature selection. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1810.02406 · arXiv
  46. Poesio M, Vieira R (1998) A corpus-based investigation of definite description use. Comput Linguist 24:183–216
  47. Prince EF (1992) The ZPG letter: subjects, definiteness, and information status. In: Mann WC, Thompson S (eds) Discourse description: diverse analyses of a fund-raising text. John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, p 295–325 · DOI
  48. Recchia G, Slater A, Louwerse M (2014) Predicting the good guy and the bad guy: attitudes are encoded in language statistics. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. pp. 1264–1269
  49. Ross RM, Greenhill SJ, Atkinson QD (2013) Population structure and cultural geography of a folktale in Europe. Proc R Soc London B 280(1756):20123065. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.3065 · DOI
  50. Ross RM, Atkinson QD (2016) Folktale transmission in the Arctic provides evidence for high bandwidth social learning among hunter-gatherer groups. Evol Human Behav 37(1):47–53 · DOI
  51. Ruck D, Bentley RA, Acerbi A, Garnett P, Hruschka DJ (2017) Role of neutral evolution in word turnover during centuries of english word popularity. Adv Complex Syst 20(06n07):1750012. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219525917500126 · DOI
  52. Russell B (1905) On denoting. Mind, 14:479-493. Reprinted in Marsh R C (ed) Logic and Knowledge. George Allen and Unwin, London
  53. Sapir E (1921) Language: An introduction to the study of speech. Hartcourt, Brace and company, New York
  54. Schmerse D, Lieven E, Tomasello M (2015) Young children use shared experience to interpret definite reference. J Child Lang 42(5):1146–1157 · DOI
  55. Schneider P, Dubé R (1997) Effect of pictorial versus oral story presentation on children’s use of referring expressions in retell. First Lang 17(51):283–302 · DOI
  56. Shennan S, Wilkinson J (2001) Ceramic style change and neutral evolution: a case study from Neolithic Europe. Am Antiq 66(4):577–593 · DOI
  57. Stubbersfield J, Tehrani JJ (2013) Expect the unexpected? Testing for minimally counterintuitive (MCI) bias in the transmission of contemporary legends: a computational phylogenetic approach. Social Sci Comput Rev 31(1):90–102 · DOI
  58. Stubbersfield JM, Tehrani JJ, Flynn EG (2015) Serial killers, spiders and cybersex: social and survival information bias in the transmission of urban legends. Br J Psychol 106(2):288–307 · DOI
  59. Stubbersfield JM, Tehrani JJ, Flynn EG (2017) Chicken tumours and a fishy revenge: evidence for emotional content bias in the cumulative recall of urban legends. J Cogn Cult 17(1-2):12–26 · DOI
  60. Stubbersfield JM, Tehrani JJ, Flynn EG (2018) Faking the news: intentional guided variation reflects cognitive biases in transmission chains without recall. Cult Sci J 10(1):54–65. https://doi.org/10.5334/csci.109 · DOI
  61. Tehrani JJ (2013) The phylogeny of little red riding hood. PloS One 8(11):e78871. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078871. online publication 13 November · DOI
  62. Tehrani JJ, Nguyen Q, Roos T (2016) Oral fairy tale or literary fake? Investigating the origins of Little Red Riding Hood using phylogenetic network analysis. Digit Scholarsh Humanit 31(3):611–636 · DOI
  63. Uther H-J (2004) The types of international folktales. A classification and bibliography. Parts I–III. Folklore Fellows Communications, Helsinki
  64. Zipes J (1993) The trials and tribulations of little red riding hood, 2nd edn. Routledge, New York, London

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 20

Metadata

Authors
Karsdorp, F., & Fonteyn, L.
Affiliations
  • Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (NL)
  • Leiden University (NL)
Corresponding author
Karsdorp, Folgert
ORCID
Venue
Palgrave Communications
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2019-02-26
Volume
5
Issue
1
ISSN
2055-1045 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1057/s41599-019-0234-9
OpenAlex
W2919424406
Cited by
20
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
25.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • KNAW Research Portal (The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistic research and analysis
Keywords
fairy tales, Little Red Riding Hood, folk tales, diachronic change, character introduction, Gricean pragmatics, maxim of quantity, cultural evolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review