Cited by 175Sentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningText and Document Classification TechnologiesEmotion and Mood Recognition

Emotion classification for short texts: an improved multi-label method

Open access
Liu, Xuan, Shi, Tianyi, Zhou, Guohui, Liu, Mingzhe, Yin, Zhengtong, Yin, Lirong, Zheng, Wenfeng·2023·Humanities and Social Sciences Communications

Abstract

The process of computationally identifying and categorizing opinions expressed in a piece of text is of great importance to support better understanding and services to online users in the digital environment. However, accurate and fast multi-label automatic classification is still insufficient. By considering not only individual in-sentence features but also the features in the adjacent sentences and the full text of the tweet, this study adjusted the Multi-label K-Nearest Neighbors (MLkNN) classifier to allow iterative corrections of the multi-label emotion classification. It applies the new method to improve both the accuracy and speed of emotion classification for short texts on Twitter. By carrying out three groups of experiments on the Twitter corpus, this study compares the performance of the base classifier of MLkNN, the sample-based MLkNN (S-MLkNN), and the label-based MLkNN (L-MLkNN). The results show that the improved MLkNN algorithm can effectively improve the accuracy of emotion classification of short texts, especially when the value of K in the MLkNN base classifier is 8, and the value of α is 0.7, and the improved L-MLkNN algorithm outperforms the other methods in the overall performance and the recall rate reaches 0.8019. This study attempts to obtain an efficient classifier with smaller training samples and lower training costs for sentiment analysis. It is suggested that future studies should pay more attention to balancing the efficiency of the model with smaller training sample sizes and the completeness of the model to cover various scenarios.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/s41599-023-01816-6

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The quality and accuracy of the explanations produced by GPT may depend on the quality and accuracy of the training data, as well as the complexity and character of the black-box model being explained.

    “Notably, the quality and accuracy of the explanations produced by GPT may depend on the quality and accuracy of the training data, as well as the complexity and character of the black-box model being explained [188,189].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, X., Shi, T., Zhou, G., Liu, M., Yin, Z., Yin, L., & Zheng, W.
Affiliations
  • University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • Wenzhou University of Technology (CN)
  • Guizhou University (CN)
  • Louisiana State University (US)
Corresponding author
Zheng, Wenfeng
Venue
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2023-06-08
Volume
10
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 2055-1045 (ISSN-L)
  • 2662-9992
OpenAlex
W4379882795
Cited by
175
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 100
FWCI
16.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Text and Document Classification Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
Keywords
emotion classification, short text, Twitter, multi-label classification, sentiment analysis, training sample size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review