CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1European Politics and SecurityEuropean Union Policy and GovernanceInternational Relations and Foreign Policy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Strategic partner election: proposal for a Binary Logistic Model for the European Union

Open access
Rivera, Pablo Podadera, Garashchuk, Anna·2023·Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
DOI 10.1057/s41599-023-02121-y
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The European Union awarded the special status of strategic partner to ten states. Its key partners are dissimilar in political philosophies and structure, power status, ethical values, economic development, unequal in size and mineral reserves. Some of them are traditional Post-Second World War partners while the others have established recent partnerships in a new multipolar world order. However, from the very beginning the EU Conception of Strategic Partnership was just an assemblage of political statements without any official definition and clear established criteria for being chosen as a strategic partner. In this regard, this paper aims to analyze the strategic partnership phenomenon in EU Foreign Policy and provide our own definition of the term with a view to underpin it subsequently by common criteria. Based upon obtained main components the Binary Logistic Model was applied, which not only did allow to make the election of EU strategic partners more science-based but also propose the potential EU partners.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/s41599-023-02121-y

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists are queued

They are fetched later and appear here then.

References 20 · Cited by 1

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Blanco LF (2016) The functions of ‘strategic partnership’ in European Union foreign policy discourse. Camb Rev Int Aff 29(1):36–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2015.1126055 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Boyacioglu MA, Kara Y, Baykan OK (2009) Predicting bank financial failures using neural networks, support vector machines and multivariate statistical methods: a comparative analysis in the sample of savings deposit insurance fund (SDIF) transferred banks in Turkey. Expert Syst Appl 36:3355–3366 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Cabrera AF (1994) Logistic regression analysis in higher education: unapplied perspective. Higher Educ Handb Theory Res 10:225–256
  4. Chuang HL (1997) High school youth’s dropout and re-enrollment behavior. Econ Educ Rev 16(2):171–186 · DOI
  5. Cihelková E, Nguyen HP, Fabuš M (2020) The EU concept of the “Strategic Partnership”: Identifying the “unifying” criteria for the differentiation of Strategic Partners. Entrepreneurship Sustain Issues 7(3):1723–1739. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2020.7.3(19) · DOI
  6. Czechowska L (2022) Joint bodies and the regularization of strategic interaction: a comparison of the European Union’s Strategic Partnerships with Japan and India. JCMS J Common Market Stud 60(4):1144–1164. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13325 · DOI
  7. De Wilde T, Pellon G (2006) The implications of the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) on the EU-Russian Strategic Partnership. Helsinki Monitor 2. Available at http://www.eisanet.org/benbruga/eisa/files/events/stockholm/Blanco%20Pan. Accessed 5 February 2021 · DOI
  8. European Commission - Press release (2021) A renewed multilateralism fit for the 21st century: the EU’s agenda. European Commission, Brussels, 17 February
  9. European Union Institute for Security Studies (2015) Towards an EU global strategy – Background, process, references. Edited by Missiroli, A. https://doi.org/10.2815/953786 · DOI
  10. Garashchuk A, Isla F, Podadera P (2022b) The empirical evidence of EU–Russia bilateral trade under sanctions and oil price shocks. Sustainability 14:7528. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137528 · DOI
  11. Garashchuk A, Isla F, Podadera P (2022a) The empirical evidence of the EU–Russia failed strategic partnership: did it have a positive impact on bilateral trade? Eur Rev 30(5):657–685. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798721000090 · DOI
  12. George D, Mallery P (2003) SPSS for windows step by step: a simple guide and reference. Allyn & Bacon, Boston, (4.ª ed.)
  13. Gratius S (2011a) ¿Profundizar el multilateralismo a través de las asociaciones estratégicas de la Unión Europea? Documento de Trabajo FRIDE, Madrid, septiembre
  14. Hubbell L (1999) A Sino-American cultural exchange during the bombing crisis: a personal experience. Asian Aff Am Rev 26(3):159–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/00927679909598824 · DOI
  15. Ismael TY, Kreutz A (2001) Russian-Iraqi relations: a historical and political analysis. Arab Stud Q 23(4):87–115
  16. Jain RK (2008) India-EU strategic partnership. In: Seidelmann R, Vasilache A (eds) European Union and Asia: a dialogue on regionalism and interregional cooperation. Baden-Baden, Nomos, pp. 277–298 · DOI
  17. Janik J, Kravitz HM (1994) Linking work and domestic problems with police suicide. Suicide Life Threatening Behav. 24(3):267–274 · DOI
  18. Karp AH (2009) Using logistic regression to predict customer retention. Sierra Information Services, Inc, New York
  19. Kay S (2000) What is a strategic partnership? Probl Post Commun 47:15–24 · DOI
  20. Kemalbay G, Korkmazoğlu ÖB (2014) Categorical principal component logistic regression: a case study for Housing Loan approval. Proc Soc Behav Sci 109(2):730–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.537 · DOI
  21. Kim G (2012) Kazajstan-Ugnaya Corea: po puti strategicheskogo partnerstva. KISI, Kazakhstan, Almaty
  22. King G, Tomz M, Wittenberg J (2000) Making the most of statistical analyses: improving interpretation and presentation. Am J Polit Sci 44:341–355 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Lavrov S (2013) State of the Union Russia-EU: prospects for partnership in the changing world. J Common Market Stud 51:6–12 · DOI
  24. Lessa AC (1998) A diplomacia universalista do Brasil: a construção do sistema contemporâneo de relações bilaterais. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional (Impresso) Brasília 41:29–41 · DOI
  25. Maihold G (2010) Stefan (eds.) Europe and New Leading Powers ‘Towards Partnership in Strategic Policy Areas, Nomos, 149–156, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  26. Medvedev D (2008) Speech at the conference about the results of Euro-Russian summit, available at http://kremlin.ru/multimedia/video/section/speeches Accessed 5 July 2020
  27. Oommen T, Baise LG, Vogel RM (2011) Sampling bias and class imbalance in Maximum-likelihood Logistic Regression. Math Geosci 43:99–120 · DOI
  28. Podadera P, Garashchuk A (2019b) Heterogeneity of the European Union’s strategic partners: can they still be compatible? Eur Rev 28(2):202–224
  29. Quevedo JA (2012) La Paradoja del Multilateralosmo Eficaz a Traves de las Asociociones Estratégicas en la Acción Exterior de la Unión Europea. Eur Sci J 8(24). https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2012.v8n24p%25p · DOI
  30. Reed P, Wu Y (2013) Logistic regression for risk factor modelling and stuttering research. J Fluen Disord 38:88–101 · DOI
  31. Sangtu K (2006) Strategic partnership in a unipolar system: the Sino-Russian relationship. Issues Stud 42(3):203–225
  32. Smith M, Timmins G (2003) The European Union, NATO & Russia. Routledge, London
  33. Tolman RM, Weisz A (1995) Coordinated community intervention for domestic violence: The effects of arrest and prosecution on recidivism of woman abuse perpetrators. Crime Delinq 41(4):481–495 · DOI
  34. Voynikov V (2015) The EU-Russia strategic partnership: its nature and perspectives, Centre for European Studies and European Union Centre of Excellence. Strategic Partnership as an Instrument of EU Foreign Policy – Workshop Report, November. Pp. 19-23

Metadata

Authors
Rivera, P. P., & Garashchuk, A.
Affiliations
Universidad de Málaga (ES)
Corresponding author
Rivera, Pablo Podadera
ORCID
Venue
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2023-10-02
Volume
10
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 2055-1045 (ISSN-L)
  • 2662-9992
DOI
10.1057/s41599-023-02121-y
OpenAlex
W4387261421
Cited by
1
References
20
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (University of Málaga) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › European Politics and Security
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › European Union Policy and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
Keywords
EU strategic partnerships, EU external relations, partner selection criteria, binary logistic regression, EU enlargement, multipolar world order

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strategic partner election: proposal for a Binary Logistic Model for the European Union. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1057/s41599-023-02121-y
The paper
Rivera, P. P., & Garashchuk, A. (2023). Strategic partner election: proposal for a Binary Logistic Model for the European Union. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02121-y