Cited by 3,232Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceAdvanced Causal Inference TechniquesData Visualization and Analytics

Making the most of statistical analyses: improving interpretation and presentation

King, Gary, Tomz, Michael, Wittenberg, Jason·2000·American Journal of Political Science

Abstract

W e show that social scientists often do not take full advantage of the information available in their statistical results and thus miss opportunities to present quantities that could shed the greatest light on their research questions. In this article we suggest an approach, built on the technique of statistical simulation, to extract the currently overlooked information and present it in a reader-friendly manner. More specifically, we show how to convert the raw results of any statistical procedure into expressions that (1) convey numerically precise estimates of the quantities of greatest substantive interest, (2) include reasonable measures of uncertainty about those estimates, and (3) require little specialized knowledge to understand. The following simple statement satisfies our criteria: “Other things being equal, an additional year of education would increase your annual income by $1,500 on average, plus or minus about $500.” Any smart high school student would understand that sentence, no matter how sophisticated the statistical model and powerful the computers used to produce it. The sentence is substantively informative because it conveys a key quantity of interest in terms the reader wants to know. At the same time, the sentence indicates how uncertain the researcher is about the estimated quantity of interest. Inferences are never certain, so any honest presentation of statistical results must include some qualifier, such as “plus or minus $500” in the present example. Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2669316

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
King, G., Tomz, M., & Wittenberg, J.
Venue
American Journal of Political Science
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
2000-04
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
347
ISSN
0092-5853 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3125554979
Cited by
3,232
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 61 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 108 · 2020: 112 · 2019: 123 · 2018: 144 · 2017: 126 · 2016: 137 · 2015: 149 · 2014: 211 · 2013: 224 · 2012: 197
FWCI
75.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Journal of Political Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
Keywords
statistical simulation, statistical interpretation, education and income, confidence intervals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review