The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Source Evaluation of Solid Waste in Building Construction
Abstract
The construction industry contributes a major portion of the waste stream in the United States. Both increased environmental awareness and increased cost for depositing waste have caused many construction companies to reevaluate their practices. So far, no scientific data are available for developing strategies to adjust to the changing parameters and requirements. This paper addresses one critical step in developing a comprehensive waste‐management system; the categorization and quantification of construction wastes. Several residential‐building projects were used to test a conceptual framework for studying the sources of solid wastes in one important segment of the construction industry. Three important categories of building materials—brick and block, dimensional lumber, and Sheetrock—were analyzed using a “sources‐of‐waste” framework. The presented research data indicate that solid wastes in residential construction are primarily scraps resulting from cutting dimensional stock material (e.g., lumber) to size. As will be shown, many factors are related to the amount of such process waste. Strong relationships between poor productivity and high waste generation are suggested.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Removal of cement mortar remains from recycled aggregate using pre-soaking approaches
Tam, V. W. Y., Tam, C. M., & Le, K. N. (2007) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.05.012 · Cited by 732
Yeheyis, M., Hewage, K., Alam, M. S., Eskicioglu, C., & Sadiq, R. (2013) · Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy · doi:10.1007/s10098-012-0481-6 · Cited by 640
Construction Waste: Quantification and Source Evaluation
Bossink, B. A. G., & Brouwers, H. J. H. (1996) · Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(1996)122:1(55 · Cited by 578
Material Waste in Building Industry: Main Causes and Prevention
Formoso, C. T., Soibelman, L., De Cesare, C., & Isatto, E. L. (2002) · Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(2002)128:4(316 · Cited by 434
Quantifying construction and demolition waste: An analytical review
Wu, Z., Yu, A. T. W., Shen, L., & Liu, G. (2014) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2014.05.010 · Cited by 400
Metadata
- Authors
- Gavilan, R. M., & Bernold, L. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
- Published
- 1994-09
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 536-552
- ISSN
- 0733-9364 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7862
- DOI
- 10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(1994)120:3(536
- OpenAlex
- W2093673142
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Source Evaluation of Solid Waste in Building Construction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(1994)120:3(536
- The paper
- Gavilan, R. M., & Bernold, L. E. (1994). Source Evaluation of Solid Waste in Building Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(1994)120%3A3(536
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.